William Johnson Temple

2.0k total citations
67 papers, 893 citations indexed

About

William Johnson Temple is a scholar working on Small Animals, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Animal Science and Zoology. According to data from OpenAlex, William Johnson Temple has authored 67 papers receiving a total of 893 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Small Animals, 33 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 30 papers in Animal Science and Zoology. Recurrent topics in William Johnson Temple's work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (35 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (33 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (29 papers). William Johnson Temple is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (35 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (33 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (29 papers). William Johnson Temple collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. William Johnson Temple's co-authors include T. Mary Foster, Lindsay R. Matthews, Michael Davison, Alan Poling, Tina McAdie, R. Kilgour, Stefan Gunnarsson, Christine J Nicol, Emily Patterson-Kane and Timothy Foster and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Dairy Science, Animal Behaviour and Physiology & Behavior.

In The Last Decade

William Johnson Temple

60 papers receiving 824 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Johnson Temple New Zealand 18 401 386 312 203 134 67 893
T. Mary Foster New Zealand 18 335 0.8× 347 0.9× 252 0.8× 184 0.9× 116 0.9× 58 888
Douglas Elliffe New Zealand 20 262 0.7× 840 2.2× 160 0.5× 379 1.9× 79 0.6× 79 1.2k
Ralph W. Richards United States 13 160 0.4× 307 0.8× 144 0.5× 201 1.0× 59 0.4× 37 538
M. Jackson Marr United States 18 166 0.4× 516 1.3× 57 0.2× 202 1.0× 110 0.8× 56 861
Ulrike Aust Austria 18 126 0.3× 240 0.6× 119 0.4× 248 1.2× 158 1.2× 27 808
Susan D. Suarez United States 19 285 0.7× 227 0.6× 305 1.0× 269 1.3× 153 1.1× 30 1.2k
Charles Locurto United States 14 117 0.3× 294 0.8× 75 0.2× 368 1.8× 99 0.7× 29 933
Carl D. Cheney United States 15 108 0.3× 230 0.6× 90 0.3× 186 0.9× 100 0.7× 53 956
Douglas K. Candland United States 20 202 0.5× 141 0.4× 164 0.5× 137 0.7× 78 0.6× 53 1.2k
Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves United States 14 98 0.2× 197 0.5× 72 0.2× 135 0.7× 135 1.0× 23 510

Countries citing papers authored by William Johnson Temple

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Johnson Temple's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Johnson Temple with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Johnson Temple more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Johnson Temple

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Johnson Temple. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Johnson Temple. The network helps show where William Johnson Temple may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Johnson Temple

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Johnson Temple. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Johnson Temple based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Johnson Temple. William Johnson Temple is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Temple, William Johnson, et al.. (2016). Selective attention in dairy cattle. Behavioural Processes. 129. 37–40. 5 indexed citations
2.
Foster, T. Mary, et al.. (2014). Object/picture recognition in hens. Behavioural Processes. 104. 53–64. 7 indexed citations
3.
Foster, T. Mary, et al.. (2014). Reinforcer magnitude and demand under fixed-ratio schedules with domestic hens. Behavioural Processes. 103. 199–210. 3 indexed citations
4.
Temple, William Johnson. (2013). Observations Upon The United Provinces Of The Netherlands. Bayerische Staatsbibliothek. 13 indexed citations
5.
Foster, T. Mary, et al.. (2012). EFFECTS OF A SIGNALED DELAY TO REINFORCEMENT IN THE PREVIOUS AND UPCOMING RATIOS ON BETWEEN‐RATIO PAUSING IN FIXED‐RATIO SCHEDULES. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 98(3). 295–309. 11 indexed citations
6.
Foster, T. Mary, et al.. (2011). BEHAVIOR‐BASED ASSESSMENT OF THE AUDITORY ABILITIES OF BRUSHTAIL POSSUMS. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 96(1). 123–138. 5 indexed citations
7.
Foster, T. Mary, et al.. (2008). A comparison of two methods for assessing critical flicker fusion frequency in hens. Behavioural Processes. 80(2). 196–200. 20 indexed citations
8.
Temple, William Johnson, et al.. (2004). Comparing demand functions when different price manipulations are used: Does unit price help?. Learning & Behavior. 32(2). 202–212. 5 indexed citations
9.
Nakagawa, Shinichi, et al.. (2004). The effects of changes in consequences on hens’ performance in delayed-matching-to-sample tasks. Behavioural Processes. 67(3). 441–451. 13 indexed citations
10.
Signal, Tania, Thomas S. Foster, & William Johnson Temple. (2001). Determination of auditory thresholds in the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). Physiology & Behavior. 73(1-2). 195–200. 8 indexed citations
11.
Foster, Timothy, et al.. (1999). Fixed-Ratio Schedule Performance of Possum (Trichosurus Vulpecula). New Zealand journal of psychology. 28(2). 79. 8 indexed citations
12.
Poling, Alan, William Johnson Temple, & T. Mary Foster. (1996). The differential outcomes effect: A demonstration in domestic chickens responding under a titrating-delayed-matching-to-sample procedure. Behavioural Processes. 36(2). 109–115. 6 indexed citations
13.
Temple, William Johnson, et al.. (1996). CONCURRENT‐SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE IN DAIRY COWS: PERSISTENT UNDERMATCHING. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 65(1). 57–80. 16 indexed citations
14.
Foster, T. Mary, et al.. (1995). Performance of domestic hens under progressive-ratio schedules of food delivery. Behavioural Processes. 34(3). 233–239. 4 indexed citations
15.
Saunders, Kathryn J., et al.. (1994). SELECTED ABSTRACTS FROM THE JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, NOVEMBER 1993. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 27(4). 761–762. 1 indexed citations
16.
Temple, William Johnson, et al.. (1993). The welfare status of egg-production in New Zealand. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production. 53. 215–217. 2 indexed citations
17.
Foster, T. Mary, et al.. (1993). Sound avoidance by hens. Behavioural Processes. 30(2). 143–156. 16 indexed citations
18.
Temple, William Johnson, et al.. (1993). THE EFFECT OF INCREASED RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS ON DISCRIMINATIVE PERFORMANCE OF THE DOMESTIC HEN IN A VISUAL ACUITY TASK. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 60(3). 595–609. 5 indexed citations
19.
Temple, William Johnson. (1965). What christians stand for in the secular world. Fortress Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations
20.
Temple, William Johnson, et al.. (1964). An essay upon the original and nature of government (1680). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026