Ulrike Aust

1.1k citations
27 papers · 812 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Ulrike Aust

27 papers receiving 797 citations

Peers

Ulrike Aust
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Developmental Biology 185
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 238
  • Social Psychology 347
  • Small Animals 125
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 266
Replace Lorenzo von Fersen with:
Lorenzo von Fersen Germany
Dalila Bovet France
Suzanne E. MacDonald Canada
Christian Schloegl Austria
Olga F. Lazareva United States
Cinzia Chiandetti Italy
Catherine Blois‐Heulin France
Bonnie M. Perdue United States
Elisabetta Versace United Kingdom
Joshua M. Plotnik United States
Ulrike Aust relative to Lorenzo von Fersen Germany Lorenzo von Fersen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Lorenzo von Fersen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ulrike Aust

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ulrike Aust's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulrike Aust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulrike Aust more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ulrike Aust

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulrike Aust. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulrike Aust. The network helps show where Ulrike Aust may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Ulrike Aust, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ulrike Aust Line = papers co-authored together Ulrike Aust links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200790
2 200881
3 200681
4 199977
5 200155
6 200044
7 201242
8 201236
9 200635
10 201335
11 200234
12 201430
13 201526
14 200324
15 200922
16 200620
17 200318
18 199918
19 20068
20 20126

About Ulrike Aust

Ulrike Aust is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Animal Science and Zoology, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Small Animals, having authored 27 papers that have together received 812 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (12 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (11 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (7 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (6 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (6 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (5 papers) and Human-Animal Interaction Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (185 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (238 citations), Social Psychology (347 citations), Small Animals (125 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (266 citations). Ulrike Aust has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ludwig Huber, Friederike Range, Nikolaus F. Troje, Yumiko Yamazaki, Onur Güntürkün, Markus Hausmann, W. Tecumseh Fitch, Martin Fieder, Nina Stobbe and Andrea Ravignani. Their work appears in journals such as The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B, Animal Cognition, Vision Research, Cognition and Learning & Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact