William James

1.4k total citations
5 papers, 86 citations indexed

About

William James is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Complementary and alternative medicine and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, William James has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 86 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Social Psychology, 1 paper in Complementary and alternative medicine and 1 paper in Physiology. Recurrent topics in William James's work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (1 paper), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (1 paper) and Biofield Effects and Biophysics (1 paper). William James is often cited by papers focused on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (1 paper), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (1 paper) and Biofield Effects and Biophysics (1 paper). William James collaborates with scholars based in . William James's co-authors include Frederick Burkhardt, John J. McDermott, Ignas K. Skrupskelis, William G. Braud, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Walt Whitman and has published in prestigious journals such as Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

William James

3 papers receiving 53 citations

Peers

William James
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Philosophy 35
  • Sociology and Political Science 16
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 16
  • History and Philosophy of Science 15
  • Social Psychology 10
Replace Robin Waterfield with:
Robin Waterfield United Kingdom
DIANÉ COLLINSON United Kingdom
Blaise Pascal France
Dalia Nassar Australia
Debra Nails United States
Constance C. Meinwald United States
Phillip Cary United States
Paul Gorner United Kingdom
Lord Shaftesbury
Paolo Leonardi Italy
Robin Waterfield United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to William James
William James · 1×
Citations per year, relative to William James
William James · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by William James

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William James more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William James

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William James. The network helps show where William James may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William James

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William James. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William James based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William James. William James is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1
Aldous Huxley: Exponent of Mysticism
0
2
Frontiers of Japanese Philosophy 7: Classical Japanese Philosophy
1
3 33
4
WELLNESS IMPLICATIONS OF RETROACTIVE INFLUENCE: EXPLORING AN OUTRAGEOUS HYPOTHESIS.
2
5
Essays in Philosophy
50

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026