William J. Gilbert

831 citations
23 papers · 427 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

William J. Gilbert

21 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

William J. Gilbert
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Numerical Analysis 167
  • Mathematical Physics 165
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 191
  • Modeling and Simulation 43
  • Algebra and Number Theory 27
Replace Merrell L. Patrick with:
Merrell L. Patrick United States
Chen Canada
A. Melman United States
Gilbert Helmberg Austria
Darrell Schmidt United States
Markus Haase Netherlands
Mamta Rani India
Julio Moro Spain
I. P. Natanson
William J. Gilbert relative to Merrell L. Patrick United States Merrell L. Patrick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Merrell L. Patrick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William J. Gilbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William J. Gilbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William J. Gilbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William J. Gilbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William J. Gilbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William J. Gilbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William J. Gilbert. The network helps show where William J. Gilbert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside William J. Gilbert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William J. Gilbert Line = papers co-authored together William J. Gilbert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987116
2 198163
3 198236
4 200329
5 198221
6 199121
7 200120
8 196817
9 199716
10 199416
11 198615
12 198413
13
Chaos and graphicsNewton's method for multiple roots
199412
14 20069
15 19847
16 19795
17 19964
18 19844
19 19931
20 19931

About William J. Gilbert

William J. Gilbert is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Numerical Analysis, Artificial Intelligence and Geometry and Topology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations (5 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (5 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (4 papers), semigroups and automata theory (3 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (3 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (3 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (2 papers) and Mathematics and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (167 citations), Mathematical Physics (165 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (191 citations), Modeling and Simulation (43 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (27 citations). William J. Gilbert has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Edward R. Vrscay, W. K. Nicholson, Jean‐Paul Allouche, Jeffrey Shallit and John Shutske. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Graphics, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Theory of Computing Systems, Canadian Journal of Mathematics and Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact