William J. Foster
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Gary J. KeeverP. S. PershanTom ChouPaul A. JanmeyCharles H. GilliamMing‐Chih ShihBeverly E. Faulkner-JonesMark L. Schlossman
- Topics
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (8 papers)Retinal and Macular Surgery (8 papers)Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaSingapore
In The Last Decade
William J. Foster
45 papers receiving 658 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Ophthalmology 275
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 229
- Molecular Biology 142
- Plant Science 114
- Biomedical Engineering 77
Countries citing papers authored by William J. Foster
This map shows the geographic impact of William J. Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William J. Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William J. Foster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William J. Foster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William J. Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William J. Foster. The network helps show where William J. Foster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William J. Foster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William J. Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William J. Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William J. Foster. William J. Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | A Mechanical Mechanism of Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy Inhibition in Vitreous Substitutes | 1 |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | Sol-Gel Systems as Vitreous Substitutes | 2 |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About William J. Foster
William J. Foster is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Molecular Medicine, having authored 46 papers that have together received 699 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (8 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (8 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (275 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (229 citations) and Neurology (61 citations). William J. Foster has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Gary J. Keever, P. S. Pershan, Tom Chou, Paul A. Janmey, Charles H. Gilliam, Ming‐Chih Shih, Beverly E. Faulkner-Jones, Mark L. Schlossman, G. M. Bommarito and Rosa M. Dávila. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Dairy Science and American Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.