William Hinton
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Topics
- Chinese history and philosophy (10 papers)China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (7 papers)Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Political Science and International RelationsSociology and Political ScienceGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William Hinton
16 papers receiving 237 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Sociology and Political Science 230
- Political Science and International Relations 158
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28
- Cultural Studies 25
- Economics and Econometrics 25
Countries citing papers authored by William Hinton
This map shows the geographic impact of William Hinton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Hinton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Hinton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Hinton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Hinton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Hinton. The network helps show where William Hinton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Hinton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Hinton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Hinton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Hinton. William Hinton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Through a glass darkly : U.S. views of the Chinese Revolution | 2 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | The importance of land reform in the reconstruction of China | 1 |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | The Great Reversal: The Privatization of China, 1978-1989 | 46 |
| 12 | The great reversal | 26 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | Turning Point in China; an Essay on the Cultural Revolution | 3 |
| 17 | Turning Point in China | 0 |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | Fanshen: A Documentary of Revolution in a Chinese Village | 75 |
| 20 | 144 |
About William Hinton
William Hinton is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 22 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (10 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (7 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (158 citations), Sociology and Political Science (230 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (28 citations). William Hinton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Tetsuya Kataoka, James Boggs, G. J. R. Linge, Terry Cannon and Alan Jenkins. Their work appears in journals such as Geographical Journal, Pacific Affairs and Monthly labor review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.