William Hambleton

667 citations
9 papers · 541 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

William Hambleton

9 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

William Hambleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Computational Mechanics 498
  • Environmental Engineering 275
  • Global and Planetary Change 175
  • Aerospace Engineering 133
  • Ocean Engineering 78
Replace S. M. Henbest with:
S. M. Henbest Australia
R. Baidya Australia
Osami Kitoh Japan
Leon Chan Australia
Jens M. Österlund Sweden
F. Unger Germany
Michael Hites United States
Junlin Yuan United States
Krishna M. Talluru Australia
George K. El Khoury Norway
William Hambleton relative to S. M. Henbest Australia S. M. Henbest's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
S. M. Henbest · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Hambleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Hambleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Hambleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Hambleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Hambleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Hambleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Hambleton. The network helps show where William Hambleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside William Hambleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Hambleton Line = papers co-authored together William Hambleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2005209
2 2005154
3 200694
4 200962
5 20098
6
Inclined cross-stream stereo PIV measurements in turbulent boundary layers.
20046
7
Investigation of the behavior of a ventilated supercavity
20075
8
Experimental study of coherent events in laminar and turbulent boundary layers
20072
9 20071

About William Hambleton

William Hambleton is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Environmental Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Ocean Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 9 papers that have together received 541 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (5 papers), Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions (4 papers), Wind and Air Flow Studies (4 papers), Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps (3 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (2 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (1 paper), Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics (1 paper) and Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (498 citations), Environmental Engineering (275 citations), Global and Planetary Change (175 citations), Aerospace Engineering (133 citations) and Ocean Engineering (78 citations). William Hambleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Hutchins, Ivan Marušič, Ellen K. Longmire, Bharathram Ganapathisubramani, Eduard Amromin, R. E. A. Arndt, Roger E. A. Arndt and Megan Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Journal of Fluids Engineering, Bulletin of the American Physical Society and Minerva Access (University of Melbourne).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact