William H. Sack
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Education top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Gregory N. ClarkeJohn R. SeeleyJ. David KinzieRichard H. AngellSpero M. MansonChanrithy HimPeter M. LewinsohnRichard E. Zinbarg
- Topics
- Migration, Health and Trauma (20 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (19 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (12 papers)
- Journals
- PEDIATRICSChild DevelopmentJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
William H. Sack
61 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Clinical Psychology 2.8k
- Sociology and Political Science 913
- General Health Professions 696
- Education 453
- Social Psychology 313
Countries citing papers authored by William H. Sack
This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Sack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Sack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Sack more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Sack
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Sack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Sack. The network helps show where William H. Sack may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William H. Sack
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William H. Sack. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William H. Sack based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William H. Sack. William H. Sack is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 97 | |
| 5 | 113 | |
| 6 | 215 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 57 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 80 | |
| 11 | 70 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 159 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 57 | |
| 16 | 150 | |
| 17 | 91 | |
| 18 | 39 | |
| 19 | 37 | |
| 20 | 83 |
About William H. Sack
William H. Sack is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Safety Research and Pharmacy, having authored 62 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Health and Trauma (20 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (19 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.8k citations), General Health Professions (696 citations) and Safety Research (195 citations). William H. Sack has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gregory N. Clarke, John R. Seeley, J. David Kinzie, Richard H. Angell, Spero M. Manson, Chanrithy Him, Peter M. Lewinsohn, Richard E. Zinbarg, Ronald F. Kinney and Diane K. Shrier. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, Child Development and Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.