William H. Riker
- Political Science and International Relations top 0.01%
- Economics and Econometrics top 0.1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.2%
- Strategy and Management top 0.5%
- Communication top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Peter C. OrdeshookGordon TullockJames M. BuchananAlfred J. HotzRonald KahnSteven J. BramsDavid Austen‐SmithPaul Milgrom
- Topics
- Game Theory and Voting Systems (20 papers)Electoral Systems and Political Participation (15 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (11 papers)
- Cited by
- Political Science and International RelationsEconomics and EconometricsGeneral Decision Sciences
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William H. Riker
70 papers receiving 8.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Political Science and International Relations 6.8k
- Economics and Econometrics 4.2k
- Sociology and Political Science 2.8k
- Strategy and Management 1.4k
- Communication 866
Countries citing papers authored by William H. Riker
This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Riker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Riker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Riker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Riker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Riker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Riker. The network helps show where William H. Riker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William H. Riker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William H. Riker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William H. Riker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William H. Riker. William H. Riker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 163 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 103 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | Perspectives on Positive Political Economybreakdown → | 517 |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 91 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | Soldiers of the States | 4 |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | Micropolitics and Macroeconomics: Discussion | 3 |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | A Theory of the Calculus of Votingbreakdown → | 1110 |
| 17 | The Theory of Political Coalitions.breakdown → | 775 |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 42 |
About William H. Riker
William H. Riker is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics and Law, having authored 75 papers that have together received 10.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Voting Systems (20 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (15 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (6.8k citations), Economics and Econometrics (4.2k citations) and General Decision Sciences (242 citations). William H. Riker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter C. Ordeshook, Gordon Tullock, James M. Buchanan, Alfred J. Hotz, Ronald Kahn, Steven J. Brams, David Austen‐Smith, Paul Milgrom, Harold Demsetz and Robert H. Bates. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, Administrative Science Quarterly and Journal of Political Economy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.