William H. Redd

10.5k citations
159 papers · 8.1k · h-index 52

Impact in

Papers in

William H. Redd

157 papers receiving 7.6k citations

Peers

William H. Redd
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 3.3k
  • Oncology 2.5k
  • Applied Psychology 440
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 431
  • Clinical Psychology 1.6k
Replace Laura S. Porter with:
Laura S. Porter United States
Robert Zachariae Denmark
Patrick O. Monahan United States
Louise Sharpe Australia
Jimmie C. Holland United States
Guro Hanevold Bjørkløf Norway
Sharon L. Manne United States
Barry Rosenfeld United States
Andreas Hinz Germany
Katherine N. DuHamel United States
William H. Redd relative to Laura S. Porter United States Laura S. Porter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Laura S. Porter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William H. Redd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Redd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Redd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Redd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Redd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Redd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Redd. The network helps show where William H. Redd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William H. Redd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William H. Redd Line = papers co-authored together William H. Redd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 159 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995364
2 2003354
3 2000341
4 2008237
5 1999195
6 1992187
7 1999180
8 2001171
9 1998169
10 1990167
11 2008155
12 2014151
13 2003148
14 1987139
15 1990132
16 1997130
17 1990119
18 2004116
19 2010113
20 1987113

About William H. Redd

William H. Redd is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Oncology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Surgery, having authored 159 papers that have together received 8.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (54 papers), Family Support in Illness (44 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (38 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (21 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (17 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (15 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (13 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (3.3k citations), Oncology (2.5k citations), Applied Psychology (440 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (431 citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.6k citations). William H. Redd has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Iceland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Katherine N. DuHamel, Paul B. Jacobsen, Sharon L. Manne, Michael A. Andrykowski, Gary Winkel, Guy H. Montgomery, Dana H. Bovbjerg, Heiðdís Valdimarsdóttir, Christine Rini and Lina Jandorf. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Psycho-Oncology, Cancer, Health Psychology and Child Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact