William H. Redd

10.5k total citations
159 papers, 8.1k citations indexed

About

William H. Redd is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Oncology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, William H. Redd has authored 159 papers receiving a total of 8.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 62 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 51 papers in Oncology and 44 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in William H. Redd's work include Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (54 papers), Family Support in Illness (44 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (38 papers). William H. Redd is often cited by papers focused on Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (54 papers), Family Support in Illness (44 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (38 papers). William H. Redd collaborates with scholars based in United States, Iceland and Denmark. William H. Redd's co-authors include Katherine N. DuHamel, Paul B. Jacobsen, Sharon L. Manne, Michael A. Andrykowski, Gary Winkel, Guy H. Montgomery, Dana H. Bovbjerg, Heiðdís Valdimarsdóttir, Christine Rini and Lina Jandorf and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Psychological Bulletin and Gastroenterology.

In The Last Decade

William H. Redd

157 papers receiving 7.6k citations

Peers

William H. Redd
Laura S. Porter United States
Andreas Hinz Germany
Louise Sharpe Australia
Patrick O. Monahan United States
Katherine N. DuHamel United States
Sharon L. Manne United States
Barry Rosenfeld United States
William H. Redd
Citations per year, relative to William H. Redd William H. Redd (= 1×) peers Robert Zachariae

Countries citing papers authored by William H. Redd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Redd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Redd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Redd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Redd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Redd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Redd. The network helps show where William H. Redd may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William H. Redd

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William H. Redd. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William H. Redd based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William H. Redd. William H. Redd is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schrag, Deborah & William H. Redd. (2018). Plenary Abstracts. Psycho-Oncology. 27(S3). 3–7. 1 indexed citations
2.
Rini, Christine, Jane E. Austin, Lisa M. Wu, et al.. (2015). The effectiveness of caregiver social support is associated with cancer survivors' memories of stem cell transplantation: A linguistic analysis of survivor narratives. Palliative & Supportive Care. 13(6). 1735–1744. 6 indexed citations
3.
Benish‐Weisman, Maya, Lisa M. Wu, Sarah L. Weinberger-Litman, et al.. (2013). Healing stories: Narrative characteristics in cancer survivorship narratives and psychological health among hematopoietic stem cell transplant survivors. Palliative & Supportive Care. 12(4). 261–267. 14 indexed citations
4.
Clark, Karen, et al.. (2012). A Unique Interactive Cognitive Behavioral Training Program for Front-Line Cancer Care Professionals. Journal of Cancer Education. 27(4). 649–655. 6 indexed citations
5.
Shelton, Rachel C., Hayley Thompson, Lina Jandorf, et al.. (2011). Training Experiences of Lay and Professional Patient Navigators for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Journal of Cancer Education. 26(2). 277–284. 24 indexed citations
6.
Mosher, Catherine E., Katherine N. DuHamel, Christine Rini, et al.. (2010). Quality of life concerns and depression among hematopoietic stem cell transplant survivors. Supportive Care in Cancer. 19(9). 1357–1365. 80 indexed citations
7.
Christie, Jennifer, et al.. (2008). A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Patient Navigation to Increase Colonoscopy Screening among Low-Income Minorities. Journal of the National Medical Association. 100(3). 278–284. 155 indexed citations
8.
Jandorf, Lina, et al.. (2005). Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: inadequate knowledge by physicians.. PubMed. 72(1). 36–44. 56 indexed citations
9.
Parsons, Susan K., Mei‐Chiung Shih, Katherine N. DuHamel, et al.. (2005). Maternal Perspectives on Children’s Health-Related Quality of Life During the First Year After Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 31(10). 1100–1115. 62 indexed citations
10.
Manne, Sharon L., Katherine N. DuHamel, Gary Winkel, et al.. (2003). Perceived Partner Critical and Avoidant Behaviors as Predictors of Anxious and Depressive Symptoms Among Mothers of Children Undergoing Hemopaietic Stem Cell Transplantation.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 71(6). 1076–1083. 14 indexed citations
11.
Thompson, Hayley, Heiðdís Valdimarsdóttir, Gary Winkel, Lina Jandorf, & William H. Redd. (2003). The Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale: psychometric properties and association with breast cancer screening. Preventive Medicine. 38(2). 209–218. 354 indexed citations
12.
Manne, Sharon L., Katherine N. DuHamel, Dana H. Bovbjerg, et al.. (2001). Social Support, Intrusive Thoughts, and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 24(3). 231–245. 85 indexed citations
13.
Vickberg, Suzanne M. Johnson, Dana H. Bovbjerg, Katherine N. DuHamel, Violante E. Currie, & William H. Redd. (2000). Intrusive Thoughts and Psychological Distress Among Breast Cancer Survivors: Global Meaning as a Possible Protective Factor. Behavioral Medicine. 25(4). 152–160. 86 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Meredith, et al.. (1999). Validation of the PTSD checklist–civilian version in survivors of bone marrow transplantation. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 12(3). 485–499. 180 indexed citations
15.
Manne, Sharon L., et al.. (1998). Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Mothers of Pediatric Cancer Survivors: Diagnosis, Comorbidity, and Utility of the PTSD Checklist as a Screening Instrument. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 23(6). 357–366. 169 indexed citations
16.
Redd, William H. & Paul B. Jacobsen. (1988). Emotions and cancer. New perspectives on an old question. Cancer. 62(S1). 1871–1879. 16 indexed citations
17.
Jacobsen, Paul B., Jimmie C. Holland, Michael A. Andrykowski, et al.. (1988). Nonpharmacologic factors in the development of posttreatment nausea with adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Cancer. 61(2). 379–385. 69 indexed citations
18.
Redd, William H.. (1976). The Effects of Adult Presence and Stated Preference on the Reinforcement Control of Children's Behavior.. Merrill-palmer Quarterly. 3 indexed citations
19.
Winston, Andrew S. & William H. Redd. (1976). Instructional Control as a Function of Adult Presence and Competing Reinforcement Contingencies. Child Development. 47(1). 264–264. 6 indexed citations
20.
Morris, Edward K. & William H. Redd. (1975). Children's Performance and Social Preference for Positive, Negative, and Mixed Adult-Child Interactions. Child Development. 46(2). 525–525. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026