Meredith Smith

604 total citations
8 papers, 484 citations indexed

About

Meredith Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Meredith Smith has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 484 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Clinical Psychology, 2 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Meredith Smith's work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers). Meredith Smith is often cited by papers focused on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers). Meredith Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Meredith Smith's co-authors include William H. Redd, Dan T. Vogl, Katherine N. DuHamel, Sheri Fehnel, Valerie Williams, Kimberly DuMont, Scott Cohen, Bruce D. Rapkin, Sara R. Palmer and Lori A. Crane and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Traumatic Stress, Psycho-Oncology and Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.

In The Last Decade

Meredith Smith

7 papers receiving 456 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Meredith Smith United States	5	214	204	169	136	68	8	484
Robert Sanderman Netherlands	8	96 0.4×	120 0.6×	160 0.9×	184 1.4×	148 2.2×	11	593
Azadeh Tavoli Iran	10	90 0.4×	139 0.7×	171 1.0×	96 0.7×	193 2.8×	29	590
Motahare Pilevarzadeh Iran	6	68 0.3×	110 0.5×	187 1.1×	97 0.7×	49 0.7×	27	411
Gregor Weißflog Germany	13	197 0.9×	104 0.5×	217 1.3×	241 1.8×	118 1.7×	46	504
Carol L. Alter United States	10	137 0.6×	131 0.6×	113 0.7×	100 0.7×	75 1.1×	24	451
Qulsoom Inayat United Kingdom	5	266 1.2×	86 0.4×	353 2.1×	256 1.9×	99 1.5×	8	595
Chao‐Hsing Yeh Taiwan	17	413 1.9×	234 1.1×	105 0.6×	247 1.8×	186 2.7×	22	751
Roanne Millman Canada	8	95 0.4×	112 0.5×	187 1.1×	80 0.6×	73 1.1×	10	411
Sheila Kelly United Kingdom	11	105 0.5×	107 0.5×	150 0.9×	66 0.5×	229 3.4×	20	562
Cheryl F. McCartney United States	9	104 0.5×	64 0.3×	152 0.9×	89 0.7×	80 1.2×	14	325

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith Smith. The network helps show where Meredith Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meredith Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meredith Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meredith Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meredith Smith. Meredith Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Loeb, Danielle F., Lori A. Crane, Erin Leister, et al.. (2016). Development and initial validation of primary care provider mental illness management and team-based care self-efficacy scales. General Hospital Psychiatry. 45. 44–50. 3 indexed citations

2.

Reger-Nash, Bill, Meredith Smith, & Gregory Juckett. (2015). Foundations of Wellness. Human Kinetics eBooks.

3.

Williams, Valerie, Meredith Smith, & Sheri Fehnel. (2006). The Validity and Utility of the BPI Interference Measures for Evaluating the Impact of Osteoarthritic Pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 31(1). 48–57. 66 indexed citations

4.

Smith, Meredith. (2002). Effective Treatments for PTSD: Practice Guidelines from the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Edited by Edna B. Foa, Terence M. Keane and Matthew J. Friedman. The Guilford Press, New York, NY, 2000. 379pp, ISBN: 157230 5843. Psycho-Oncology. 12(1). 98–100. 2 indexed citations

5.

Smith, Meredith, et al.. (1999). Validation of the PTSD checklist–civilian version in survivors of bone marrow transplantation. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 12(3). 485–499. 180 indexed citations

6.

Smith, Meredith, et al.. (1999). Post-traumatic stress disorder in cancer: a review. Psycho-Oncology. 8(6). 521–537. 195 indexed citations

7.

Smith, Meredith, et al.. (1999). Post‐traumatic stress disorder in cancer: a review. Psycho-Oncology. 8(6). 521–537. 7 indexed citations

8.

Rapkin, Bruce D., et al.. (1994). Development of the Idiographic functional status assessment: A measure of the personal goals and goal attainment activities of people with AIDS. Psychology and Health. 9(1-2). 111–129. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact