William H. Garner
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Physiology top 5%
- Clinical Biochemistry top 1%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Abraham SpectorMargaret H. GarnerFrank R.N. GurdRoberto ChiesaJanet SredyAjay PandeDebdutta RoyRen-Rong Wang
- Topics
- Connexins and lens biology (15 papers)Biochemical effects in animals (11 papers)Hemoglobin structure and function (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
William H. Garner
38 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Molecular Biology 1.2k
- Physiology 427
- Clinical Biochemistry 338
- Cell Biology 311
- Ophthalmology 195
Countries citing papers authored by William H. Garner
This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Garner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Garner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Garner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Garner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Garner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Garner. The network helps show where William H. Garner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William H. Garner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William H. Garner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William H. Garner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William H. Garner. William H. Garner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 54 | |
| 2 | Dioptin™ Eye Drop to Treat Presbyopia: corneal penetration and ocular pharmacokinetics | 1 |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 99 | |
| 10 | Nuclear magnetic resonance microscopic ocular imaging for the detection of early-stage cataract. | 7 |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | H2O2-modification of Na,K-ATPase. Alterations in external Na+ and K+ stimulation of K+ influx. | 12 |
| 14 | 133 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 98 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 38 |
About William H. Garner
William H. Garner is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Cell Biology and Ophthalmology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Connexins and lens biology (15 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (11 papers) and Hemoglobin structure and function (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (338 citations), Ophthalmology (195 citations) and Cell Biology (311 citations). William H. Garner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Abraham Spector, Margaret H. Garner, Frank R.N. Gurd, Roberto Chiesa, Janet Sredy, Ajay Pande, Debdutta Roy, Ren-Rong Wang, Guoming Wang and Douglas Borchman. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.