William H. Coles
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Rosalie K. CrouchPatrice GoletzGeorge O. WaringMichael LynnLouis A. WilsonE.J. DukeJ. A. V. SimsonT. Michael Redmond
- Topics
- Corneal Surgery and Treatments (4 papers)Corneal surgery and disorders (4 papers)Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (4 papers)
- Cited by
- OphthalmologyRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Partner nations
- United StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
William H. Coles
15 papers receiving 317 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 171
- Ophthalmology 158
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 153
- Molecular Biology 61
- Surgery 27
Countries citing papers authored by William H. Coles
This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Coles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Coles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Coles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Coles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Coles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Coles. The network helps show where William H. Coles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William H. Coles
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William H. Coles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William H. Coles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William H. Coles. William H. Coles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | Kinetics of corneal epithelial maintenance and graft loss. A population balance model. | 50 |
| 4 | Ophthalmology: A Diagnostic Text | 2 |
| 5 | 62 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | Effects of antibiotics on the in vitro rabbit corneal endothelium. | 12 |
| 13 | Intraocular injuries, their immediate surgical management | 1 |
| 14 | 63 | |
| 15 | 19 |
About William H. Coles
William H. Coles is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal Surgery and Treatments (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (4 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (158 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (171 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (153 citations). William H. Coles has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Rosalie K. Crouch, Patrice Goletz, George O. Waring, Michael Lynn, Louis A. Wilson, E.J. Duke, J. A. V. Simson, T. Michael Redmond, Armand B. Glassman and John Patrick. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Experimental Eye Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.