William Goodnight

1.8k total citations
41 papers, 686 citations indexed

About

William Goodnight is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, William Goodnight has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 686 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 15 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in William Goodnight's work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (9 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (9 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (7 papers). William Goodnight is often cited by papers focused on Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (9 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (9 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (7 papers). William Goodnight collaborates with scholars based in United States, Zambia and Switzerland. William Goodnight's co-authors include David E. Soper, Roger Newman, Tara Hulsey, Christopher Robinson, Margaret S. Villers, Donna Johnson, Mark Alanis, Elizabeth G. Hill, T. C. Bjornn and Steven Swift and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Critical Care Medicine.

In The Last Decade

William Goodnight

40 papers receiving 653 citations

Peers

William Goodnight
Joanne N. Quiñones United States
George J. Gilson United States
Tyler Bardsley United States
Kim Hinshaw United Kingdom
Sarah C. Fisher United States
Robert J. Stiller United States
Samuel Bauer United States
William Goodnight
Citations per year, relative to William Goodnight William Goodnight (= 1×) peers Diana Ramašauskaitė

Countries citing papers authored by William Goodnight

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Goodnight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Goodnight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Goodnight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Goodnight

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Goodnight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Goodnight. The network helps show where William Goodnight may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Goodnight

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Goodnight. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Goodnight based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Goodnight. William Goodnight is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Strauss, Robert A., et al.. (2022). Elevated midtrimester maternal plasma cytokines and preterm birth in patients with cerclage. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM. 4(5). 100624–100624. 1 indexed citations
2.
Goodnight, William, Anthony Odibo, Bryann Bromley, et al.. (2021). Frequency and prediction of persistent urinary tract dilation in third trimester and postnatal urinary tract dilation in infants following diagnosis in second trimester. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 59(4). 522–531. 4 indexed citations
3.
Lillegard, Joseph B., Stephanie A. Eyerly‐Webb, David Watson, et al.. (2021). Placental Location in Maternal-Fetal Surgery for Myelomeningocele. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 49(3). 117–124. 6 indexed citations
4.
Cools, Michael J., et al.. (2019). Thirty-day medical and surgical readmission following prenatal versus postnatal myelomeningocele repair. Neurosurgical FOCUS. 47(4). E14–E14. 8 indexed citations
5.
Kessler, B., Michael P. Catalino, Carolyn Quinsey, William Goodnight, & Scott Elton. (2019). Cost of prenatal versus postnatal myelomeningocele closure for both mother and child at 1 year of life. Neurosurgical FOCUS. 47(4). E15–E15. 8 indexed citations
6.
Goodnight, William, et al.. (2018). Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: Case report☆. Radiology Case Reports. 14(3). 354–359. 10 indexed citations
7.
Vladutiu, Catherine J., et al.. (2017). Gestational age at initiation of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate and recurrent preterm birth. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 217(3). 371.e1–371.e7. 22 indexed citations
8.
Dotters‐Katz, Sarah K., et al.. (2017). Use of prophylactic antibiotics in women with previable prelabor rupture of membranes. Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. 10(4). 431–437. 3 indexed citations
9.
Moise, Kenneth J., Julie S. Moldenhauer, Kelly Bennett, et al.. (2016). Current Selection Criteria and Perioperative Therapy Used for Fetal Myelomeningocele Surgery. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 127(3). 593–597. 36 indexed citations
10.
Grace, Matthew R., et al.. (2016). Prophylactic Antibiotics in Twin Pregnancies Complicated by Previable Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. American Journal of Perinatology Reports. 6(3). e277–e282. 6 indexed citations
11.
Goodnight, William, et al.. (2015). Spontaneous Posterior Uterine Rupture in Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(1). e68–e70. 2 indexed citations
12.
Bovbjerg, Marit L., Anna Maria Siega‐Riz, Kelly R. Evenson, & William Goodnight. (2014). Exposure Analysis Methods Impact Associations Between Maternal Physical Activity and Cesarean Delivery. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 12(1). 37–47. 4 indexed citations
13.
Goodnight, William, et al.. (2014). Temporal trends in maternal medical conditions and stillbirth. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 212(5). 673.e1–673.e11. 20 indexed citations
14.
Berry, Diane C., Emily Hall, Todd A. Schwartz, et al.. (2013). Rationale, design, and methodology for the optimizing outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their infants study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 13(1). 184–184. 26 indexed citations
15.
Haeri, Sina, et al.. (2011). Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancy. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 30(3). 297–301. 8 indexed citations
16.
Haeri, Sina, et al.. (2010). Ultrasound prediction of birthweight and growth restriction in fetal gastroschisis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 203(4). 395.e1–395.e5. 17 indexed citations
17.
Swift, Steven, et al.. (2010). Test–retest reliability of the cotton swab (Q-tip®) test in the evaluation of the incontinent female. International Urogynecology Journal. 21(8). 963–967. 7 indexed citations
18.
Goodnight, William & Roger Newman. (2009). Optimal Nutrition for Improved Twin Pregnancy Outcome. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 114(5). 1121–1134. 62 indexed citations
19.
Sullivan, Scott, et al.. (2008). The use of blunt needles does not reduce glove perforations during obstetrical laceration repair. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 199(6). 639.e1–639.e4. 10 indexed citations
20.
Swift, Steven, et al.. (2008). Pelvic organ prolapse: is there a difference in POPQ exam results based on time of day, morning or afternoon?. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 199(2). 200.e1–200.e5. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026