William G. Roberts

18 total papers · 428 total citations
10 papers, 329 citations indexed

About

William G. Roberts is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, William G. Roberts has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 329 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Surgery, 3 papers in Epidemiology and 2 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in William G. Roberts's work include Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (2 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (2 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers). William G. Roberts is often cited by papers focused on Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (2 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (2 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers). William G. Roberts collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. William G. Roberts's co-authors include Eugene R. Heyman, Stanley Heshka, Hans‐Peter Guler, Mark P. Ettinger, Sherwyn Schwartz, Stuart Weiss, Steven B. Heymsfield, Harris McIlwain, George A. Bray and Nancy Stambler and has published in prestigious journals such as Gastroenterology, The American Journal of Medicine and The American Journal of Cardiology.

In The Last Decade

William G. Roberts

9 papers receiving 308 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
William G. Roberts 93 89 81 65 59 10 329
Johnson Hd 72 0.8× 72 0.8× 25 0.3× 11 0.2× 14 0.2× 9 341
G Bona 76 0.8× 63 0.7× 45 0.6× 128 2.0× 18 0.3× 11 355
Francis Seow 142 1.5× 67 0.8× 29 0.4× 8 0.1× 10 0.2× 13 317
Angelo M. Taveira Da Silva 33 0.4× 94 1.1× 66 0.8× 26 0.4× 57 1.0× 16 335
Tomas Symersky 166 1.8× 36 0.4× 60 0.7× 62 1.0× 36 0.6× 11 315
Sowsan Rasheid 165 1.8× 17 0.2× 101 1.2× 60 0.9× 48 0.8× 9 353
Karen Gallagher‐Dorval 99 1.1× 137 1.5× 131 1.6× 77 1.2× 20 0.3× 9 335
J W Benson 163 1.8× 57 0.6× 86 1.1× 27 0.4× 34 0.6× 8 363
Cemalettin Topuzlu 195 2.1× 26 0.3× 28 0.3× 11 0.2× 49 0.8× 17 349
S G Chiverton 124 1.3× 16 0.2× 41 0.5× 12 0.2× 9 0.2× 14 353

Countries citing papers authored by William G. Roberts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Roberts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Roberts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Roberts. The network helps show where William G. Roberts may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William G. Roberts

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William G. Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William G. Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William G. Roberts. William G. Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026