William G. Nash

2.7k total citations
43 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

William G. Nash is a scholar working on Genetics, Plant Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, William G. Nash has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Genetics, 18 papers in Plant Science and 17 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in William G. Nash's work include Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (15 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (9 papers) and Virus-based gene therapy research (8 papers). William G. Nash is often cited by papers focused on Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (15 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (9 papers) and Virus-based gene therapy research (8 papers). William G. Nash collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and United Kingdom. William G. Nash's co-authors include Stephen J. O’Brien, Joan C. Menninger, Maurice Cohen, Johannes Wienberg, Tom I. Bonner, Raoul Ė. Benveniste, Catherine M. O’Connell, Arthur W. Nienhuis, M.A. Ferguson‐Smith and Charles J. Sherr and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Cell.

In The Last Decade

William G. Nash

43 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

William G. Nash

GENET

IMMUN

ECOLO

Tadasu Shin‐I Japan

Kei‐ichi Kuma Japan

Susan R. Haynes United States

Doris H. Wurster‐Hill United States

James Tomfohrde United States

Gene Levinson United States

William S. Modi United States

Christopher J. Jolly Australia

Gregory Hinkle United States

K Kuma Japan

Tadasu Shin‐I Japan

William G. Nash

1.6k ×1.5

686 ×0.7

GENET

736 ×1.2

366 ×1.2

IMMUN

183 ×0.9

ECOLO

Citations per year, relative to William G. Nash William G. Nash (= 1×) peers Tadasu Shin‐I

Countries citing papers authored by William G. Nash

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Nash

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Nash. The network helps show where William G. Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William G. Nash

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William G. Nash. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William G. Nash based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William G. Nash. William G. Nash is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Nash, William G., Joan C. Menninger, Hesed Padilla‐Nash, et al.. (2008). The Ancestral Carnivore Karyotype (2n = 38) Lives Today in Ringtails. Journal of Heredity. 99(3). 241–253. 15 indexed citations

Antunes, Agostinho, Shu‐Jin Luo, Joan C. Menninger, et al.. (2005). Evolutionary analysis of a large mtDNA translocation (numt) into the nuclear genome of the Panthera genus species. Gene. 366(2). 292–302. 74 indexed citations

Beck, Thomas W., Joan C. Menninger, William J. Murphy, et al.. (2004). The feline major histocompatibility complex is rearranged by an inversion with a breakpoint in the distal class I region. Immunogenetics. 56(10). 702–709. 22 indexed citations

Nash, William G., Joan C. Menninger, Johannes Wienberg, Hesed Padilla‐Nash, & Stephen J. O’Brien. (2001). The pattern of phylogenomic evolution of the Canidae. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 95(3-4). 210–224. 57 indexed citations

Beck, Thomas W., Joan C. Menninger, William G. Nash, et al.. (2001). Comparative Feline Genomics: A BAC/PAC Contig Map of the Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Region. Genomics. 71(3). 282–295. 29 indexed citations

Padilla‐Nash, Hesed, William G. Nash, George M. Padilla, et al.. (1999). Molecular cytogenetic analysis of the bladder carcinoma cell line BK-10 by spectral karyotyping. Genes Chromosomes and Cancer. 25(1). 53–59. 36 indexed citations

Schriml, Lynn M., Hesed Padilla‐Nash, William G. Nash, et al.. (1999). Tyramide Signal Amplification (TSA)-FISH Applied to Mapping PCR-Labeled Probes Less than 1 kb in Size. BioTechniques. 27(3). 608–613. 33 indexed citations

Nash, William G., Johannes Wienberg, M.A. Ferguson‐Smith, Joan C. Menninger, & Stephen J. O’Brien. (1998). Comparative genomics: tracking chromosome evolution in the family Ursidae using reciprocal chromosome painting. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 83(3-4). 182–192. 72 indexed citations

O’Brien, Stephen J., Janice S. Martenson, Mary Ann Thompson, et al.. (1997). Comparative Gene Mapping in the Domestic Cat (Felis catus). Journal of Heredity. 88(5). 408–414. 41 indexed citations

10.

Wienberg, Johannes, Roscoe Stanyon, William G. Nash, et al.. (1997). Conservation of human vs. feline genome organization revealed by reciprocal chromosome painting. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 77(3-4). 211–217. 101 indexed citations

11.

Nash, William G. & Stephen J. O’Brien. (1987). A comparative chromosome banding analysis of the Ursidae and their relationship to other carnivores. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 45(3-4). 206–212. 45 indexed citations

12.

Modi, William S., William G. Nash, Anna C. Ferrari, & Stephen J. O’Brien. (1987). Cytogenetic methodologies for gene mapping and comparative analyses in mammalian cell culture systems. PubMed. 4(4). 75–85. 47 indexed citations

13.

O’Brien, Stephen J., William G. Nash, Raoul Ė. Benveniste, David E. Wildt, & Mitch Bush. (1986). Palaeontological and molecular views of panda phylogeny. Nature. 319(6052). 428–428. 2 indexed citations

14.

Nash, William G., et al.. (1986). Gene networks in development. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 119(4). 379–396. 18 indexed citations

15.

O’Brien, Stephen J., Mark E. Haskins, Cheryl A. Winkler, William G. Nash, & Donald F. Patterson. (1986). Chromosomal mapping of beta-globin and albino loci in the domestic cat. Journal of Heredity. 77(6). 374–378. 23 indexed citations

16.

O’Brien, Stephen J., William G. Nash, David E. Wildt, Μ. Bush, & Raoul Ė. Benveniste. (1985). A molecular solution to the riddle of the giant panda's phylogeny. Nature. 317(6033). 140–144. 131 indexed citations

17.

Reeves, Roger H., William G. Nash, & Stephen J. O’Brien. (1985). Genetic mapping of endogenous RD-114 retroviral sequences of domestic cats. Journal of Virology. 56(1). 303–306. 20 indexed citations

18.

Bonner, Tom I., Stephen J. O’Brien, William G. Nash, et al.. (1984). The Human Homologs of the raf ( mil ) Oncogene Are Located on Human Chromosomes 3 and 4. Science. 223(4631). 71–74. 162 indexed citations

19.

Lemons, Richard S., William G. Nash, Stephen J. O’Brien, Raoul Ė. Benveniste, & Charles J. Sherr. (1978). A gene (Bevi) on human chromosome 6 is an integration site for baboon type C DNA provirus in human cells. Cell. 14(4). 995–1005. 41 indexed citations

20.

Nash, William G., et al.. (1977). A further characterization of the cinnamon gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Molecular and General Genetics MGG. 155(2). 171–177. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact