William G. Mayer

470 total citations
26 papers, 297 citations indexed

About

William G. Mayer is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Communication and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, William G. Mayer has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 297 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 5 papers in Communication and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in William G. Mayer's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (16 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers). William G. Mayer is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (16 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers). William G. Mayer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Canada. William G. Mayer's co-authors include Nelson W. Polsby and Jean‐Sébastien Boudrias and has published in prestigious journals such as Preventive Medicine, Public Opinion Quarterly and Political Science Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

William G. Mayer

23 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers

William G. Mayer
William G. Mayer
Citations per year, relative to William G. Mayer William G. Mayer (= 1×) peers Marjorie Randon Hershey

Countries citing papers authored by William G. Mayer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Mayer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Mayer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Mayer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Mayer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Mayer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Mayer. The network helps show where William G. Mayer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William G. Mayer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William G. Mayer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William G. Mayer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William G. Mayer. William G. Mayer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mayer, William G., et al.. (2024). Cognitive flexibility and adaptive performance among workers: Testing the moderating effect of the situational strength on this relationship. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration. 41(4). 549–557. 1 indexed citations
2.
Mayer, William G., et al.. (2018). The Divided Democrats.
3.
Mayer, William G.. (2015). Why Trump – and How Far Can He Go?. The Forum. 13(4). 541–558. 2 indexed citations
4.
Mayer, William G.. (2014). What, If Anything, Have We Learned from Presidential Election Forecasting?. PS Political Science & Politics. 47(2). 329–331. 3 indexed citations
5.
Mayer, William G.. (2013). How the Romney Campaign Blew it. The Forum. 10(4). 40–50. 3 indexed citations
6.
Mayer, William G.. (2012). The Disappearing--but Still Important--Swing Voter. The Forum. 10(3). 4 indexed citations
7.
Mayer, William G.. (2010). Retrospective Voting in Presidential Primaries. Presidential Studies Quarterly. 40(4). 660–685. 1 indexed citations
8.
Mayer, William G.. (2008). Handicapping the 2008 Nomination Races: An Early Winter Prospectus. The Forum. 5(4). 6 indexed citations
9.
Mayer, William G.. (2008). The Swing Voter in American Politics. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University). 38 indexed citations
10.
Mayer, William G.. (2007). The Swing Voter in American Presidential Elections. American Politics Research. 35(3). 358–388. 41 indexed citations
11.
Mayer, William G.. (2005). What conservative media? The unproven case for conservative media bias. Critical Review. 17(3-4). 315–338. 5 indexed citations
12.
Mayer, William G., et al.. (2004). Can the Federal Government Reform the Presidential Nomination Process?. Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy. 3(4). 613–625. 1 indexed citations
14.
Mayer, William G.. (2003). Forecasting Presidential Nominations or, My Model Worked Just Fine, Thank You. PS Political Science & Politics. 36(2). 153–157. 25 indexed citations
15.
Mayer, William G.. (2003). The Basic Dynamics of the Presidential Nomination Process: Putting the 2000 Races in Perspective. Presidential Studies Quarterly. 33(1). 72–100. 6 indexed citations
16.
Mayer, William G.. (2001). The Polls—Trends. Public Opinion Quarterly. 65(4). 585–606. 6 indexed citations
17.
Mayer, William G.. (1996). In Defense of Negative Campaigning. Political Science Quarterly. 111(3). 437–455. 58 indexed citations
18.
Mayer, William G.. (1996). Comment: Of Money and Momentum. Political Research Quarterly. 49(4). 719–726. 7 indexed citations
19.
Mayer, William G.. (1994). Poll Trends: The Rise of the New Media. Public Opinion Quarterly. 58(1). 124–124. 7 indexed citations
20.
Mayer, William G.. (1992). The Changing American Mind. Preventive Medicine. 47(2). 156–60. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026