William G. Hendren
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Surgery
- Epidemiology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Delos M. CosgroveEliot R. RosenkranzWilliam J. StewartJames C. BartlettDennis D. O’KeefeWillard M. DaggettLorne K. GarrettsonEllis L. Jones
- Topics
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (6 papers)Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (5 papers)Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
William G. Hendren
19 papers receiving 560 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 349
- Surgery 256
- Epidemiology 222
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 204
- Emergency Medicine 111
Countries citing papers authored by William G. Hendren
This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Hendren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Hendren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Hendren more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Hendren
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Hendren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Hendren. The network helps show where William G. Hendren may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William G. Hendren
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William G. Hendren. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William G. Hendren based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William G. Hendren. William G. Hendren is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 70 | |
| 3 | 143 | |
| 4 | 85 | |
| 5 | Immediate postoperative care of the cardiac surgical patient. | 3 |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 59 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 78 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 6 |
About William G. Hendren
William G. Hendren is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (6 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (5 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (349 citations), Emergency Medicine (111 citations) and Biochemistry (61 citations). William G. Hendren has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Delos M. Cosgrove, Eliot R. Rosenkranz, William J. Stewart, James C. Bartlett, Dennis D. O’Keefe, Willard M. Daggett, Lorne K. Garrettson, Ellis L. Jones, Mikel D. Smith and Bruce W. Lytle. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, The American Journal of Cardiology and American Heart Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.