Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Case 34-1990
1990749 citationsRichard C. Cabot, Robert E. Scully et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by William F. McNeely
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William F. McNeely's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William F. McNeely with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William F. McNeely more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William F. McNeely
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William F. McNeely. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William F. McNeely. The network helps show where William F. McNeely may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William F. McNeely
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William F. McNeely.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William F. McNeely based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William F. McNeely. William F. McNeely is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1994). Case 29-1994. New England Journal of Medicine. 331(4). 259–265.5 indexed citations
2.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1994). Case 19-1994. New England Journal of Medicine. 330(19). 1376–1381.4 indexed citations
3.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1994). Case 26-1994. New England Journal of Medicine. 330(26). 1887–1893.11 indexed citations
4.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1994). Case 4-1994. New England Journal of Medicine. 330(4). 273–280.5 indexed citations
5.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1993). Case 33-1993. New England Journal of Medicine. 329(8). 561–568.2 indexed citations
6.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1993). Case 34-1993. New England Journal of Medicine. 329(9). 645–653.3 indexed citations
7.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1992). Case 30-1992. New England Journal of Medicine. 327(4). 261–268.4 indexed citations
8.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1992). Case 25-1992. New England Journal of Medicine. 326(25). 1682–1692.3 indexed citations
9.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1992). Case 36-1992. New England Journal of Medicine. 327(11). 790–799.6 indexed citations
10.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1991). Case 41-1991. New England Journal of Medicine. 325(15). 1086–1096.11 indexed citations
11.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1990). Case 2-1990. New England Journal of Medicine. 322(2). 116–123.3 indexed citations
12.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1990). Case 36-1990. New England Journal of Medicine. 323(10). 659–667.4 indexed citations
13.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1990). Case 20-1990. New England Journal of Medicine. 322(20). 1446–1458.5 indexed citations
14.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1990). Case 27-1990. New England Journal of Medicine. 323(1). 42–51.3 indexed citations
15.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1990). Case 8-1990. New England Journal of Medicine. 322(8). 531–543.13 indexed citations
16.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1989). Case 28-1989. New England Journal of Medicine. 321(2). 102–110.3 indexed citations
17.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1989). Case 50-1989. New England Journal of Medicine. 321(24). 1665–1672.1 indexed citations
18.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1988). Case 13-1988. New England Journal of Medicine. 318(13). 835–842.5 indexed citations
19.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1988). Case 8-1988. New England Journal of Medicine. 318(8). 500–508.1 indexed citations
20.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Eugene J. Mark, et al.. (1987). Case 36-1987. New England Journal of Medicine. 317(10). 614–623.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.