William E. Scott

9.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
186 papers, 6.8k citations indexed

About

William E. Scott is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, William E. Scott has authored 186 papers receiving a total of 6.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 56 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 51 papers in Surgery and 43 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in William E. Scott's work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (53 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (35 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (18 papers). William E. Scott is often cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (53 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (35 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (18 papers). William E. Scott collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Greece. William E. Scott's co-authors include Ronald V. Keech, Pamela J. Kutschke, David J. Cherrington, A. J. Mash, H. Joseph Reitz, Stephen P. Kraft, Klearchos K. Papas, Jiing‐Lih Farh, C. F. Krewson and Wanda Pfeifer and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

William E. Scott

171 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Hit Papers

Molecular theory of gases and liquids 1955 2026 1978 2002 1955 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William E. Scott United States 39 1.4k 1.1k 1.0k 776 734 186 6.8k
Hugh Montgomery United Kingdom 69 478 0.3× 120 0.1× 1.6k 1.5× 334 0.4× 1.0k 1.4× 528 17.9k
A. P. Young United States 60 622 0.4× 240 0.2× 1.4k 1.4× 402 0.5× 849 1.2× 200 24.8k
Kenneth J. Smith United Kingdom 51 2.8k 2.1× 182 0.2× 581 0.6× 381 0.5× 321 0.4× 255 10.1k
Peter J. Smith United States 55 239 0.2× 245 0.2× 531 0.5× 556 0.7× 586 0.8× 418 11.1k
Paul Smith United Kingdom 49 535 0.4× 126 0.1× 501 0.5× 247 0.3× 329 0.4× 217 6.8k
James Turner United States 45 181 0.1× 556 0.5× 487 0.5× 223 0.3× 216 0.3× 382 9.1k
Peter E. Andersen United States 50 180 0.1× 227 0.2× 364 0.4× 1.5k 1.9× 1.2k 1.7× 377 9.2k
Ladislav Šenolt Czechia 37 430 0.3× 69 0.1× 1.0k 1.0× 840 1.1× 420 0.6× 174 8.4k
James R. Stone United States 60 374 0.3× 240 0.2× 2.4k 2.3× 531 0.7× 2.1k 2.9× 348 14.0k
Suet Yi Leung Hong Kong 59 2.8k 2.0× 82 0.1× 935 0.9× 322 0.4× 2.6k 3.6× 302 15.1k

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Scott. The network helps show where William E. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William E. Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William E. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William E. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William E. Scott. William E. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Berishvili, Ekaterine, Lorenzo Piemonti, Eelco J.P. de Koning, et al.. (2024). ESOT Roadmap for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Transplantation: Navigating Regulatory Challenges to Enhance Access and Care. Transplant International. 37. 13485–13485. 5 indexed citations
2.
Freitas, Leo, et al.. (2021). Persufflation—Current State of Play. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(3). 362–378.
3.
Weegman, Bradley P., Thomas M. Suszynski, Michael Rizzari, et al.. (2016). Continuous Quadrupole Magnetic Separation of Islets during Digestion Improves Purified Porcine Islet Viability. Journal of Diabetes Research. 2016. 1–10. 2 indexed citations
4.
Weegman, Bradley P., Michael J. Taylor, Simona Baicu, et al.. (2011). 124. Hypothermic perfusion preservation of pancreas for islet grafts: Validation using a split lobe porcine model. Cryobiology. 63(3). 340–340.
5.
Kutschke, Pamela J. & William E. Scott. (2004). Prism adaptation in visually mature patients with esotropia of childhood onset. Ophthalmology. 111(1). 177–179. 7 indexed citations
6.
Donahue, Sean P., et al.. (2002). Sensitivity of photoscreening to detect high-magnitude amblyogenic factors. Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 6(2). 86–91. 34 indexed citations
7.
Scott, William E., Pamela J. Kutschke, & W. Robert Lee. (1995). 20th Annual Frank Costenbader Lecture-Adult Strabismus. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. 32(6). 348–352. 69 indexed citations
8.
Keech, Ronald V., et al.. (1994). Factors Affecting Visual Outcome After Surgery for Bilateral Congenital Cataracts. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 117(1). 58–64. 65 indexed citations
9.
Morris, Robert, William E. Scott, & Ronald V. Keech. (1992). Superior Oblique Tuck Surgery in the Management of Superior Oblique Palsies/Superior Oblique Tuck Surgery in the Management of Superior Oblique Palsies: Discussion. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. 29(6). 337–348. 19 indexed citations
10.
Bale, James F., William E. Scott, William T. C. Yuh, Yutaka Satō, & Arnold H. Menezes. (1988). Congenital fourth nerve palsy and occult cranium bifidum. Pediatric Neurology. 4(5). 320–321. 3 indexed citations
11.
Scott, William E., Jiing‐Lih Farh, & Philip M. Podsakoff. (1988). The effects of “intrinsic” and “extrinsic” reinforcement contingencies on task behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 41(3). 405–425. 61 indexed citations
12.
Scott, William E., et al.. (1985). Amblyopia Case Reports - Bilateral Hypermetropic Ametropic Amblyopia. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. 22(5). 203–205. 27 indexed citations
13.
Scott, William E., et al.. (1983). ORTHOPTICS AND OCULAR EXAMINATION TECHNIQUES. Optometry and Vision Science. 60(11). 930–930. 12 indexed citations
14.
Scott, William E.. (1982). The continuing problem of pain: a discussion paper.. PubMed. 75(2). 117–20. 1 indexed citations
15.
Hayreh, Sohan Singh & William E. Scott. (1979). Anterior segment ischemia following retinal detachment surgery.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 20. 148–53. 15 indexed citations
16.
Scott, William E.. (1978). New Zealand backs down from alternative energy search. 1 indexed citations
17.
Scott, William E.. (1976). Australia takes new look at tidal energy. 13. 41–43. 1 indexed citations
18.
Metz, Henry S, et al.. (1974). Saccadic Velocity and Active Force Studies In Blow-Out Fractures Of The Orbit. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 78(4). 665–670. 36 indexed citations
19.
Cummings, L. L. & William E. Scott. (1973). Readings in organizational behavior and human performance. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026