William E. Pine

95 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

William E. Pine
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.8k
  • Aquatic Science 617
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.3k
  • Ecology 1.4k
  • Water Science and Technology 264
Replace Tor F. Næsje with:
Tor F. Næsje Norway
Richard W. Zabel United States
Ola Ugedal Norway
Greg G. Sass United States
Martha E. Mather United States
James R. Irvine Canada
Andrew L. Rypel United States
John M. Dettmers United States
Harold L. Schramm United States
Zeb Hogan United States
William E. Pine relative to Tor F. Næsje Norway Tor F. Næsje's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Tor F. Næsje · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Pine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Pine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Pine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Pine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Pine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Pine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Pine. The network helps show where William E. Pine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Pine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Pine Line = papers co-authored together William E. Pine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003276
2 2007213
3 2007156
4 201094
5 200175
6 201166
7 201164
8 200658
9 201557
10 201257
11 200655
12 200055
13 200952
14 201551
15 200749
16 200548
17 200147
18 200441
19 200040
20 200840

About William E. Pine

William E. Pine is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Aquatic Science and Water Science and Technology, having authored 99 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (70 papers), Marine and fisheries research (53 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (19 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (17 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (15 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (13 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (12 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.8k citations), Aquatic Science (617 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.3k citations), Ecology (1.4k citations) and Water Science and Technology (264 citations). William E. Pine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth H. Pollock, Carl J. Walters, Micheal S. Allen, Thomas J. Kwak, Lewis G. Coggins, James A. Rice, Joseph E. Hightower, Matthew J. Catalano, Steven J.D. Martell and Edward V. Camp. Their work appears in journals such as North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, River Research and Applications, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences and Marine and Coastal Fisheries.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact