William E. James

64 papers receiving 532 citations

Peers

William E. James
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 150
  • Development 28
  • Economics and Econometrics 135
  • Ecological Modeling 20
  • Strategy and Management 69
Replace Jarmo Rusanen with:
Jarmo Rusanen Finland
Ashok Κ. Dutt United States
Heidi Hausermann United States
Steve Harrison United States
Stephen Young United Kingdom
T.M.J.A. Cooray Sri Lanka
Risto Lehtonen Finland
Javed Iqbal Pakistan
McKenzie F. Johnson United States
Edson Severnini United States
William E. James relative to Jarmo Rusanen Finland Jarmo Rusanen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Jarmo Rusanen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. James

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. James's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. James with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. James more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. James

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. James. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. James. The network helps show where William E. James may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. James, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. James Line = papers co-authored together William E. James links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1960171
2 199449
3 197633
4 199128
5
JAMES, WILLIAM E.
196827
6 196724
7
Development or deterioration? : work in rural Asia
199422
8 200322
9 197919
10 196617
11 200117
12 199817
13 200315
14 198713
15 199410
16 199710
17 198910
18 197910
19 19938
20 19938

About William E. James

William E. James is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Development, Finance, Strategy and Management and Soil Science, having authored 73 papers that have together received 685 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global trade and economics (24 papers), Global Trade and Competitiveness (10 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (9 papers), Natural Resources and Economic Development (5 papers), World Trade Organization Law (5 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (5 papers), International Development and Aid (4 papers) and Economic Growth and Productivity (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (150 citations), Development (28 citations), Economics and Econometrics (135 citations), Ecological Modeling (20 citations) and Strategy and Management (69 citations). William E. James has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include George F. Badger, John H. Dingle, Roy B. Mefferd, Betty A. Wieland, Robert J. Warren, Michael J. Conroy, Duane R. Diefenbach, James Roumasset, R. F. Grover and Peter Minor. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Energy Policy, Journal of World Trade, Journal of Applied Physiology and Review of World Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026