William E. Brady

6.3k citations
116 papers · 4.4k indexed · h-index 36

William E. Brady

114 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Peers

William E. Brady
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Reproductive Medicine 958
  • Microbiology 495
  • Biochemistry 387
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 442
  • Cancer Research 480
Replace Nea Malila with:
Nea Malila Finland
Vesa Kataja Finland
Sandeep Mathur India
Hideyuki Akaza Japan
Eddie Reed United States
Lars Erik Rutqvist Sweden
Sharad Sharma India
David F. Paulson United States
Susanne Osanto Netherlands
Christine Bouchardy Switzerland
William E. Brady relative to Nea Malila Finland Nea Malila's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Nea Malila · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Brady

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Brady's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Brady with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Brady more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Brady

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Brady. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Brady. The network helps show where William E. Brady may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Brady, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Brady Line = papers co-authored together William E. Brady links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20203
2 201762
3 201749
4 20172
5
Optimizing Tests about Survival Probabilities in the One-Arm Phase II Cancer Clinical Trial Setting
20171
6 201629
7 201627
8 20161
9 201538
10 201431
11 201438
12 201241
13 201188
14
LDL-C-lowering efficacy of the ezetimibe/simvastatin single tablet compared with atorvastatin or roslivastatin in elderly patients with hype rcholesterolemia
200610
15 200692
16 2005232
17 200535
18 200226
19 200298
20 200146

About William E. Brady

William E. Brady is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Microbiology, having authored 116 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (37 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (14 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (12 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (11 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (10 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (9 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (7 papers) and Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (958 citations), Microbiology (495 citations) and Biochemistry (387 citations). William E. Brady has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Joanne Palmisano, Wendy P. Battisti, Ronald Klein, Julie A. Mares‐Perlman, Phyllis E. Bowen, Maria Stacewicz‐Sapuntzakis, David M. Gershenson, Heather A. Lankes, Mari Palta and Thomas A. Pearson. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology, Clinical Cancer Research and Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026