William Dust

906 total citations
24 papers, 647 citations indexed

About

William Dust is a scholar working on Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, William Dust has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 647 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and 3 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in William Dust's work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (5 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (5 papers). William Dust is often cited by papers focused on Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (5 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (5 papers). William Dust collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Brazil. William Dust's co-authors include Geoffrey Johnston, S. A. Lang, Allan T. Dolovich, Glen Watson, J. David Cassidy, Aaron J. Bois, Raymond W. Yip, David J. Cassidy, G.E. Morris and Alan L. Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Infectious Diseases, The American Journal of Sports Medicine and The Journal of Arthroplasty.

In The Last Decade

William Dust

22 papers receiving 601 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Dust Canada 10 607 75 61 48 44 24 647
Joseph T. O’Neil United States 14 489 0.8× 249 3.3× 134 2.2× 38 0.8× 31 0.7× 37 647
B. Roetman Germany 12 432 0.7× 12 0.2× 23 0.4× 248 5.2× 59 1.3× 31 514
G. Asencio France 14 495 0.8× 47 0.6× 128 2.1× 157 3.3× 20 0.5× 44 601
Efthimios J. Karadimas Greece 12 577 1.0× 420 5.6× 16 0.3× 41 0.9× 67 1.5× 19 704
Michael S. Roh United States 9 675 1.1× 103 1.4× 33 0.5× 136 2.8× 9 0.2× 11 694
Christopher L. McCrum United States 13 439 0.7× 15 0.2× 54 0.9× 282 5.9× 22 0.5× 26 481
Ahmet Yılmaz Şarlak Türkiye 12 440 0.7× 149 2.0× 9 0.1× 25 0.5× 16 0.4× 34 487
Peter J. Brooks United States 15 820 1.4× 11 0.1× 43 0.7× 41 0.9× 9 0.2× 43 860
C. Josten Germany 14 495 0.8× 38 0.5× 29 0.5× 304 6.3× 4 0.1× 56 535
Holger Keil Germany 13 374 0.6× 36 0.5× 69 1.1× 87 1.8× 3 0.1× 56 456

Countries citing papers authored by William Dust

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Dust's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Dust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Dust more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Dust

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Dust. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Dust. The network helps show where William Dust may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Dust

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Dust. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Dust based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Dust. William Dust is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sardroud, Hamed Alizadeh, et al.. (2024). Comparison study on hyaline cartilage versus fibrocartilage formation in a pig model by using 3D-bioprinted hydrogel and hybrid constructs. Biofabrication. 17(1). 15014–15014. 4 indexed citations
2.
Mendez, Ivar, Brian Ulmer, & William Dust. (2022). Saskatchewan: Canada’s first provincial department of surgery. Canadian Journal of Surgery. 65(6). E825–E831.
3.
Whiting, Susan J., Wenbin Li, Jacqueline Quail, et al.. (2020). Predictors of hip fractures and mortality in long-term care homes in Saskatchewan: Does vitamin D supplementation play a role?. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 200. 105654–105654. 2 indexed citations
4.
Dust, William, et al.. (2020). The physiopathology of osteoarthritis: Paleopathological implications of non-articular lesions from a modern surgical sample. International Journal of Paleopathology. 32. 31–40. 1 indexed citations
5.
Obaid, Haron, et al.. (2020). Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Correlation between Preoperative Radiographic Severity of Arthritis and Postoperative Patient Satisfaction. The Journal of Knee Surgery. 34(13). 1441–1445. 6 indexed citations
6.
Thorpe, Lilian, Susan J. Whiting, Wenbin Li, et al.. (2017). The Incidence of Hip Fractures in Long-Term Care Homes in Saskatchewan from 2008 to 2012: an Analysis of Provincial Administrative Databases. Canadian Geriatrics Journal. 20(3). 97–104. 3 indexed citations
7.
Bois, Aaron J. & William Dust. (2008). Posterior Fracture Dislocation of the Ankle: Technique and Clinical Experience Using a Posteromedial Surgical Approach. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 22(9). 629–636. 51 indexed citations
8.
Tufescu, Ted & William Dust. (2004). Failure of a new constrained acetabular insert. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 19(2). 238–239. 8 indexed citations
9.
Dust, William, et al.. (2002). Missed acute isolated peroneal compartment syndrome. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine. 4(5). 355–358. 16 indexed citations
10.
Sanche, Stephen, William Dust, & Yvonne Shevchuk. (2000). Vancomycin-Induced Neutropenia Resolves after Substitution with Teicoplanin. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 31(3). 824–825. 17 indexed citations
11.
Johnston, Geoffrey, et al.. (1998). Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 13(1). 80–84. 146 indexed citations
12.
Lang, S. A., et al.. (1998). Intraoperative Transcruciate Injection: A New Approach to Postoperative Analgesia Following Total Knee Arthroplasty. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 23(Suppl 1). 34–34. 4 indexed citations
13.
Jones, Alan L., et al.. (1997). OPEN PELVIC FRACTURES. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 28(3). 345–350. 72 indexed citations
14.
Morris, G.E., et al.. (1997). The parasacral sciatic nerve block†. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 22(3). 223–228. 54 indexed citations
15.
Lang, Scott A., et al.. (1997). A comparison of three regional anaesthesia techniques for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie. 44(4). 371–376. 44 indexed citations
16.
Lang, S. A., et al.. (1996). Femoral Nerve Block: Single Injection versus Continuous Infusion for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Regional Anesthesia The Journal of Neural Blockade in Obstetrics Surgery & Pain Control. 21(4). 292–297. 90 indexed citations
17.
Johnston, Geoffrey, et al.. (1995). Radiographic calculation of anteversion in acetabular prostheses. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 10(3). 369–372. 92 indexed citations
18.
Lang, S. A., et al.. (1995). Combined Femoral 3 in 1 Nerve Block and Intra-Articular Local Anesthesia for Knee Arthroscopy. Regional Anesthesia The Journal of Neural Blockade in Obstetrics Surgery & Pain Control. 20(Suppl 2). 29–29. 1 indexed citations
19.
Stern, Paula, Pierre Côté, & William Dust. (1994). Pelvic insufficiency fracture simulating metastatic bone disease.. PubMed. 17(7). 485–8. 5 indexed citations
20.
Hains, François, J. David Cassidy, & William Dust. (1993). Pelvic chondrosarcoma presenting as mechanical back pain: two case reports. Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 37(1). 15–21.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026