William Darko

33 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

William Darko
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Internal Medicine 36
  • Clinical Biochemistry 63
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 17
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 28
  • Pharmacology 96
Replace Robert W. Seabury with:
Robert W. Seabury United States
William Peppard United States
Melanie Smith United States
Darrel W. Hughes United States
Mir Mohammad Miri Iran
Rodolfo Sbrojavacca Italy
Carlo Rotelli Italy
Jennifer D. Twilla United States
Andrew C. Faust United States
Chad A. Knoderer United States
William Darko relative to Robert W. Seabury United States Robert W. Seabury's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Robert W. Seabury · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Darko

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Darko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Darko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Darko more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Darko

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Darko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Darko. The network helps show where William Darko may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Darko, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Darko Line = papers co-authored together William Darko links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200363
2 201644
3 201928
4 202222
5 202015
6 201012
7 201611
8 201011
9 200310
10 201710
11 20218
12 20197
13 20197
14 20196
15 20196
16 20085
17 20225
18 20195
19
Myoclonus secondary to the concurrent use of trazodone and fluoxetine.
20014
20 20134

About William Darko

William Darko is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery, Pharmacology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 38 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (6 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (5 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (4 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (4 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (36 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (63 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (17 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (28 citations) and Pharmacology (96 citations). William Darko has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Robert W. Seabury, Christopher D. Miller, Adrienne Smith, Roy Guharoy, Jeffrey M. Steele, David F. Lehmann, Joseph J. Medicis, Christopher Miller, Wesley D. Kufel and John Noviasky. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Annals of Pharmacotherapy, Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy and JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact