William Craelius
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Nabil El‐SherifMichael WiningerWilliam B. GoughVictor ChenSamuel PhillipsRaphael HenkinRobert H. ZeilerJames A. Flint
- Topics
- Muscle activation and electromyography studies (17 papers)Ion channel regulation and function (17 papers)Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (16 papers)
- Cited by
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineCellular and Molecular NeuroscienceCognitive Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandItaly
In The Last Decade
William Craelius
63 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 740
- Biomedical Engineering 648
- Molecular Biology 553
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 470
- Cognitive Neuroscience 384
Countries citing papers authored by William Craelius
This map shows the geographic impact of William Craelius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Craelius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Craelius more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Craelius
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Craelius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Craelius. The network helps show where William Craelius may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Craelius
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Craelius. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Craelius based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Craelius. William Craelius is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 31 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 52 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 68 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 37 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About William Craelius
William Craelius is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (17 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (17 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (740 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (470 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (384 citations). William Craelius has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Nabil El‐Sherif, Michael Wininger, William B. Gough, Victor Chen, Samuel Phillips, Raphael Henkin, Robert H. Zeiler, James A. Flint, William L. Green and Dennis R. Harris. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Circulation Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.