William Chongyang Zhou
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 5%
- Accounting top 10%
- Topics
- International Business and FDI (7 papers)Innovation and Knowledge Management (6 papers)Global trade and economics (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Strategy and ManagementBusiness and International ManagementManagement of Technology and Innovation
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
William Chongyang Zhou
19 papers receiving 440 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Economics and Econometrics 254
- Strategy and Management 228
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 80
- Management of Technology and Innovation 79
- Accounting 53
Countries citing papers authored by William Chongyang Zhou
This map shows the geographic impact of William Chongyang Zhou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Chongyang Zhou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Chongyang Zhou more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Chongyang Zhou
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Chongyang Zhou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Chongyang Zhou. The network helps show where William Chongyang Zhou may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Chongyang Zhou
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Chongyang Zhou. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Chongyang Zhou based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Chongyang Zhou. William Chongyang Zhou is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 65 | |
| 17 | 56 | |
| 18 | 57 | |
| 19 | A study on institutional barriers of Chinese companies going global | 7 |
| 20 | The Triple Helix Model for Innovation: The University-industry-government interaction | 30 |
About William Chongyang Zhou
William Chongyang Zhou is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 23 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Business and FDI (7 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (6 papers) and Global trade and economics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (228 citations), Business and International Management (27 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (79 citations). William Chongyang Zhou has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Hong Jin, Ruicheng Wang, Yanrui Wu, Дора Маринова, Sunny Li Sun, Bojun Hou, Hongying Wang, Feng Feng, Daying Yan and Henry Etzkowitz. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Operational Research, Research Policy and Journal of Business Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.