William Cecil

631 citations
14 papers · 473 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

William Cecil

13 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

William Cecil
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 148
  • Surgery 284
  • Health Information Management 19
  • Emergency Medicine 40
  • Emergency Medical Services 22
Replace Beiqun Zhao with:
Beiqun Zhao United States
G Grötte United Kingdom
Matthew Kumar Canada
Alfred S. Casale United States
Christopher P. Scally United States
Ravinder Kang United States
Justin Yeung Canada
Kevin Major United States
Blake N. Shultz United States
Robert Hayden Canada
William Cecil relative to Beiqun Zhao United States Beiqun Zhao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27.5×
Beiqun Zhao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Cecil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Cecil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Cecil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Cecil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Cecil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Cecil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Cecil. The network helps show where William Cecil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside William Cecil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Cecil Line = papers co-authored together William Cecil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2015233
2 2012116
3 201038
4 198837
5 200612
6
A meta-analysis update: percutaneous coronary interventions.
200812
7 197911
8 20193
9 20163
10 20213
11 20203
12 19871
13 20201
14 20200

About William Cecil

William Cecil is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 14 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (2 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (1 paper), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (1 paper), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (1 paper) and Hemoglobin structure and function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (148 citations), Surgery (284 citations), Health Information Management (19 citations), Emergency Medicine (40 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (22 citations). William Cecil has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Oscar D. Guillamondegui, Joseph B. Cofer, Brian J. Daley, Barbara J. Martin, Oliver L. Gunter, Eugene E. Fibuch, Panagiotis Kasteridis, Cyril F. Chang, Teresa M. Waters and William Reed. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Surgeons, The American Surgeon, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Health Services Research and Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact