Blake N. Shultz

33 papers receiving 525 citations

Peers

Blake N. Shultz
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Internal Medicine 39
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 39
  • Surgery 333
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 100
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 125
Replace Ahmad Elnahas with:
Ahmad Elnahas Canada
Fouad Chouairi United States
J. Shabbir United Kingdom
Savyasachi C. Thakkar United States
Schmidt Germany
Kevin Wang United States
Monil Majmundar United States
Rohil Malpani United States
Richard P. Billingham United States
Dennis W. Ashley United States
Blake N. Shultz relative to Ahmad Elnahas Canada Ahmad Elnahas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Ahmad Elnahas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Blake N. Shultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Blake N. Shultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Blake N. Shultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Blake N. Shultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Blake N. Shultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Blake N. Shultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Blake N. Shultz. The network helps show where Blake N. Shultz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Blake N. Shultz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Blake N. Shultz Line = papers co-authored together Blake N. Shultz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017100
2 201954
3 201744
4 201734
5 201726
6 201726
7 202225
8 202024
9 201822
10 201718
11 201918
12 201814
13 201614
14 201814
15 201913
16 202211
17 20189
18 20189
19 20208
20 20187

About Blake N. Shultz

Blake N. Shultz is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics and General Health Professions, having authored 34 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hip and Femur Fractures (7 papers), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (6 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (5 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (3 papers) and Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (39 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (39 citations), Surgery (333 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (100 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (125 citations). Blake N. Shultz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan N. Grauer, Patawut Bovonratwet, Nathaniel T. Ondeck, Ryan P. McLynn, Jonathan J. Cui, Connor J. Peck, Taylor D. Ottesen, Robin T. Wu, Derek M. Steinbacher and Daniel D. Bohl. Their work appears in journals such as The Spine Journal, The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, Journal of Hospital Medicine, Spine and Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact