William C. Lauerman

2.2k total citations
40 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

William C. Lauerman is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, William C. Lauerman has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Surgery, 20 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 13 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in William C. Lauerman's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (20 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (15 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (13 papers). William C. Lauerman is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (20 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (15 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (13 papers). William C. Lauerman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Indonesia. William C. Lauerman's co-authors include James E. Cain, Dieter Schellinger, Sam W. Wiesel, David Borenstein, Scott D. Boden, James W. O'Mara, Molly T. Vogt, Michael J. Yaszemski, James Glover and James D. Kang and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Radiology and Spine.

In The Last Decade

William C. Lauerman

40 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

William C. Lauerman
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Surgery 994
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 984
  • Pharmacology 687
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 191
  • Biomedical Engineering 170
Replace Stephen J. Edmondston with:
Stephen J. Edmondston Australia
Donald R. Gore United States
Hossein Mehdian United Kingdom
Richard Kendall United States
Curtis W. Slipman United States
Yoram Folman Israel
Bengt Lind Sweden
Jean-Yves Maigne France
Maureen C. Jensen United States
Michael Gofeld Canada
Stephen J. Edmondston Australia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to William C. Lauerman
William C. Lauerman · 1×
Citations per year, relative to William C. Lauerman
William C. Lauerman · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by William C. Lauerman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Lauerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Lauerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Lauerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Lauerman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Lauerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Lauerman. The network helps show where William C. Lauerman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William C. Lauerman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William C. Lauerman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William C. Lauerman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William C. Lauerman. William C. Lauerman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 24
2 151
3
The spine and sports
1
4 17
5 29
6 93
7 272
8 8
9 105
10 155
11 167
12 38
13 54
14 53
15 10
16 43
17 6
18 20
19 11
20 20

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026