Bengt Lind

3.6k total citations
50 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

Bengt Lind is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Bengt Lind has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 33 papers in Surgery and 15 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Bengt Lind's work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (38 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (20 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (20 papers). Bengt Lind is often cited by papers focused on Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (38 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (20 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (20 papers). Bengt Lind collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Iceland and Belgium. Bengt Lind's co-authors include Anders Nordwall, Björn Zoëga, Vincent Pointillart, Klaus Liebig, Carlo Logroscino, Pierre Kehr, Jan Goffin, Adrian T. H. Casey, Helena Brisby and Frank Van Calenbergh and has published in prestigious journals such as Spine, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and Neurosurgery.

In The Last Decade

Bengt Lind

49 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Bengt Lind Sweden 27 2.3k 2.3k 576 143 132 50 2.8k
Hossein Mehdian United Kingdom 24 2.4k 1.0× 1.6k 0.7× 632 1.1× 193 1.3× 110 0.8× 81 2.9k
Avraam Ploumis Greece 26 2.1k 0.9× 1.6k 0.7× 264 0.5× 88 0.6× 61 0.5× 96 2.7k
John G. DeVine United States 22 1.6k 0.7× 1.5k 0.7× 723 1.3× 44 0.3× 160 1.2× 58 2.4k
Hamilton Hall Canada 27 1.3k 0.6× 1.1k 0.5× 1.3k 2.2× 300 2.1× 167 1.3× 93 2.7k
Wilco Jacobs Netherlands 37 2.6k 1.1× 2.1k 0.9× 1.5k 2.5× 67 0.5× 151 1.1× 87 3.5k
Michael P. Grevitt United Kingdom 26 1.6k 0.7× 1.2k 0.5× 574 1.0× 76 0.5× 152 1.2× 74 2.0k
John C. France United States 26 1.7k 0.8× 1.2k 0.5× 274 0.5× 66 0.5× 91 0.7× 70 2.1k
Jean-Yves Maigne France 26 1.3k 0.6× 1.5k 0.7× 1.2k 2.0× 57 0.4× 258 2.0× 66 2.4k
Robert Gunzburg Belgium 28 1.3k 0.6× 1.4k 0.6× 1.2k 2.1× 133 0.9× 219 1.7× 79 2.3k
William C. Lauerman United States 21 994 0.4× 984 0.4× 687 1.2× 191 1.3× 99 0.8× 40 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Bengt Lind

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bengt Lind's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bengt Lind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bengt Lind more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bengt Lind

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bengt Lind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bengt Lind. The network helps show where Bengt Lind may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bengt Lind

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bengt Lind. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bengt Lind based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bengt Lind. Bengt Lind is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hägg, Olle, et al.. (2019). Follow-up of degenerative lumbar spine surgery—PROMs stabilize after 1 year: an equivalence study based on Swespine data. European Spine Journal. 28(9). 2187–2197. 27 indexed citations
2.
Bartels, Ronald, et al.. (2016). Publication rate of paper and podium presentations from the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society Annual Meeting. European Spine Journal. 25(7). 2311–2316. 22 indexed citations
3.
Löfgren, Håkan, Birgitta Öberg, Anders Holtz, et al.. (2015). Factors Affecting the Outcome of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy. Spine. 40(20). 1553–1563. 25 indexed citations
4.
Löfgren, Håkan, Birgitta Öberg, Anders Holtz, et al.. (2013). Surgery Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy. Spine. 38(20). 1715–1722. 67 indexed citations
5.
Peolsson, Anneli, Anne Söderlund, Bengt Lind, et al.. (2013). Physical Function Outcome in Cervical Radiculopathy Patients After Physiotherapy Alone Compared With Anterior Surgery Followed by Physiotherapy. Spine. 38(4). 300–307. 53 indexed citations
6.
Lind, Bengt, et al.. (2010). Clinical factors of importance for outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery: long-term follow-up. European Spine Journal. 19(9). 1459–1467. 78 indexed citations
7.
Lind, Bengt, et al.. (2008). Peridural scar and its relation to clinical outcome: a randomised study on surgically treated lumbar disc herniation patients. European Spine Journal. 17(12). 1714–1720. 58 indexed citations
8.
Halldin, Klas, et al.. (2008). Three-dimensional radiological classification of lumbar disc herniation in relation to surgical outcome. International Orthopaedics. 33(3). 725–730. 17 indexed citations
10.
Halldin, Klas, Björn Zoëga, Bengt Lind, & Claes–Göran Cederlund. (2005). Clinical application of a new three-dimensional radiological classification of lumbar disc herniations.. Hirsla (Landspítali University Hospital). 110(2). 159–65. 4 indexed citations
11.
Halldin, Klas, et al.. (2005). Is increased segmental motion early after lumbar discectomy related to poor clinical outcome 5 years later?. International Orthopaedics. 29(4). 260–264. 12 indexed citations
12.
Leung, Clarence, Jan Goffin, Pierre Kehr, et al.. (2005). Clinical Significance of Heterotopic Ossification in Cervical Disc Replacement: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial. Neurosurgery. 57(4). 759–763. 153 indexed citations
13.
Halldin, Klas, et al.. (2005). The effect of standard lumbar discectomy on segmental motion: 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry. International Orthopaedics. 29(2). 83–87. 11 indexed citations
14.
Anderberg, Leif, Mårten Annertz, Rune Hedlund, et al.. (2004). Pisksnärtsskada ingen indikation för kraniocervikal fusion. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 2 indexed citations
15.
Goffin, Jan, Frank Van Calenbergh, J. van Loon, et al.. (2003). Intermediate Follow-up After Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease With the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: Single-Level and Bi-Level. Spine. 28(24). 2673–2678. 287 indexed citations
16.
Goffin, Jan, Adrian T. H. Casey, Pierre Kehr, et al.. (2002). Preliminary Clinical Experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. Neurosurgery. 51(3). 840–847. 210 indexed citations
17.
Strömqvist, Björn, et al.. (2001). The Swedish National Register for Lumbar Spine Surgery: Swedish Society for Spinal Surgery. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 72(2). 99–106. 68 indexed citations
18.
Christensen, Ole M., et al.. (2001). Plaster cast compared with bridging external fixation for distal radius fractures of the Colles' type. International Orthopaedics. 24(6). 358–360. 13 indexed citations
19.
Mooney, Vert, et al.. (1998). Comparison of Hydroxyapatite Granules to Autogenous Bone Graft in Fusion Cages in a Goat Model. Surgical Neurology. 49(6). 628–634. 16 indexed citations
20.
Zoëga, Björn, Johan Kärrholm, & Bengt Lind. (1998). Plate fixation adds stability to two-level anterior fusion in the cervical spine: a randomized study using radiostereometry. European Spine Journal. 7(4). 302–307. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026