William C. Howell

1.1k total citations
66 papers, 748 citations indexed

About

William C. Howell is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, William C. Howell has authored 66 papers receiving a total of 748 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 9 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in William C. Howell's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (7 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (5 papers). William C. Howell is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (7 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (5 papers). William C. Howell collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Cyprus. William C. Howell's co-authors include Sarah A. Burnett, Irwin L. Goldstein, William Johnston, Nancy J. Cooke, Michael C. Fu, Christos G. Panayiotou, Jay Boyd Best, Charles F. Gettys, David A. Schum and Lee Friedman and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Psychological Bulletin and Journal of Applied Psychology.

In The Last Decade

William C. Howell

63 papers receiving 634 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William C. Howell United States 16 178 144 140 108 102 66 748
Kazuhisa Takemura Japan 16 123 0.7× 118 0.8× 202 1.4× 81 0.8× 30 0.3× 87 763
Kip Smith United States 10 405 2.3× 135 0.9× 148 1.1× 72 0.7× 52 0.5× 43 858
Murray Sinclair United Kingdom 13 135 0.8× 43 0.3× 63 0.5× 133 1.2× 32 0.3× 41 794
Scott Peterson United States 13 567 3.2× 211 1.5× 41 0.3× 42 0.4× 202 2.0× 27 1.4k
Alonso Vera United States 18 311 1.7× 288 2.0× 43 0.3× 82 0.8× 355 3.5× 56 1.3k
Geoff Vining United States 10 218 1.2× 129 0.9× 26 0.2× 114 1.1× 35 0.3× 29 1.0k
M. Hammerton United Kingdom 11 69 0.4× 165 1.1× 203 1.4× 47 0.4× 75 0.7× 36 859
Maxwell J. Roberts United Kingdom 18 88 0.5× 147 1.0× 152 1.1× 38 0.4× 200 2.0× 44 800
Cheryl A. Bolstad United States 18 527 3.0× 57 0.4× 34 0.2× 58 0.5× 110 1.1× 40 893
Matthew J. Dry Australia 16 93 0.5× 149 1.0× 43 0.3× 50 0.5× 178 1.7× 34 774

Countries citing papers authored by William C. Howell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Howell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Howell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Howell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Howell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Howell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Howell. The network helps show where William C. Howell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William C. Howell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William C. Howell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William C. Howell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William C. Howell. William C. Howell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jesús, María De, et al.. (2023). Examining the Role of Quality of Institutionalized Healthcare on Maternal Mortality in the Dominican Republic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(14). 6413–6413. 2 indexed citations
2.
Daniel, Mark, Carlos González, William C. Howell, et al.. (2022). Team IHMC at the 2020 Cybathlon: a user-centered approach towards personal mobility exoskeletons. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 19(1). 103–103. 2 indexed citations
3.
Howell, William C.. (1993). Engineering Psychology in a Changing World. Annual Review of Psychology. 44(1). 231–263. 27 indexed citations
4.
Turnage, Janet J. & William C. Howell. (1991). Technostress: Fad, Fallacy, or Fact?. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting. 35(13). 923–924.
5.
Howell, William C.. (1986). On Calling a Spade a Spade. Contemporary Psychology. 31(6). 457–458. 1 indexed citations
6.
Klatzky, Roberta L., et al.. (1985). Experimental psychologists in industry: Perspectives of employers, employees, and educators.. American Psychologist. 40(9). 1031–1037. 9 indexed citations
7.
Howell, William C., et al.. (1981). Contribution of psychological variables to the prediction of thermal comfort judgments in real world settings. ASHRAE winter conference papers. 14 indexed citations
8.
Howell, William C., et al.. (1981). Uncertainty Measurement in a Complex Task as a Function of Response Mode and Event Type Characteristics.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 1 indexed citations
9.
Howell, William C., et al.. (1979). Intuitive Frequency Judgments as a Function of Prior Expectations, Observed Evidence, and Individual Processing Strategies.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 1 indexed citations
10.
Howell, William C.. (1973). Representation of frequency in memory.. Psychological Bulletin. 80(1). 44–53. 54 indexed citations
11.
Howell, William C.. (1970). Intuitive "counting" and "tagging" in memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 85(2). 210–215. 3 indexed citations
12.
Johnston, William, William C. Howell, & Robert C. Williges. (1969). The components of complex monitoring. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 4(2). 112–124. 5 indexed citations
13.
Howell, William C., et al.. (1968). Population stereotypy in code design. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 3(3). 310–339. 33 indexed citations
14.
Goldstein, Irwin L., et al.. (1968). Effect of percentage and specificity of feedback on choice behavior in a probabilistic information-processing task.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 52(2). 163–168. 15 indexed citations
15.
Howell, William C., William Johnston, & Irwin L. Goldstein. (1966). INFLUENCE OF STRESS VARIABLES ON DISPLAY DESIGN.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 1 indexed citations
16.
Johnston, William, William C. Howell, & Irwin L. Goldstein. (1966). Human vigilance as a function of signal frequency and stimulus density.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 72(5). 736–743. 20 indexed citations
17.
Howell, William C.. (1966). Task characteristics in sequential decision behavior.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 71(1). 124–131. 5 indexed citations
18.
Howell, William C., et al.. (1964). Instructional sets and subjective criterion levels in a complex information-processing task.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 68(6). 612–614. 7 indexed citations
19.
Howell, William C., et al.. (1962). Human Choice Reaction Time within and among Sense Modalities. Science. 135(3502). 429–430. 2 indexed citations
20.
Howell, William C.. (1962). On the heterogeneity of stimulus and response elements in the processing of information.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 63(3). 235–243. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026