William C. Barker

1.4k total citations
24 papers, 694 citations indexed

About

William C. Barker is a scholar working on Information Systems, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, William C. Barker has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 694 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Information Systems, 7 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in William C. Barker's work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Information and Cyber Security (5 papers). William C. Barker is often cited by papers focused on Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Information and Cyber Security (5 papers). William C. Barker collaborates with scholars based in United States, Egypt and United Kingdom. William C. Barker's co-authors include Elaine B. Barker, Richard E. Carson, Jeih‐San Liow, Calvin A. Johnson, Miles E. Smid, William T. Polk, William E. Burr, H. Richard Alexander, Mary P. Andrich and Douglas L. Fraker and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

In The Last Decade

William C. Barker

21 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William C. Barker United States 12 247 141 107 87 74 24 694
Jason W. Chan United States 16 410 1.7× 217 1.5× 307 2.9× 87 1.0× 47 0.6× 58 1.0k
Can Zhao United States 15 370 1.5× 179 1.3× 29 0.3× 373 4.3× 60 0.8× 46 857
Dagmar Krefting Germany 14 278 1.1× 58 0.4× 24 0.2× 40 0.5× 180 2.4× 105 1.0k
David Clunie United States 19 351 1.4× 244 1.7× 23 0.2× 156 1.8× 12 0.2× 44 838
Mikhail Milchenko United States 10 437 1.8× 467 3.3× 11 0.1× 76 0.9× 30 0.4× 23 1.1k
Kuan‐Hao Su United States 16 507 2.1× 149 1.1× 140 1.3× 182 2.1× 16 0.2× 40 853
Donald J. Peck United States 21 1.1k 4.4× 126 0.9× 51 0.5× 261 3.0× 12 0.2× 45 1.6k
Shunxing Bao United States 14 472 1.9× 257 1.8× 16 0.1× 359 4.1× 32 0.4× 85 908
Carole Lartizien France 23 1.1k 4.5× 175 1.2× 298 2.8× 203 2.3× 21 0.3× 70 1.4k
Thomas Tolxdorff Germany 12 314 1.3× 96 0.7× 12 0.1× 131 1.5× 79 1.1× 87 675

Countries citing papers authored by William C. Barker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Barker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Barker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Barker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William C. Barker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Barker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Barker. The network helps show where William C. Barker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William C. Barker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William C. Barker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William C. Barker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William C. Barker. William C. Barker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Barker, Elaine B. & William C. Barker. (2019). Recommendation for Key Management: Part 2 Best Practices for Key Management Organizations. 4 indexed citations
2.
Barker, William C. & Elaine B. Barker. (2012). Recommendation for the Triple Data Encryption Algorithm (TDEA) Block Cipher | NIST. 51 indexed citations
3.
Barker, William C. & Elaine B. Barker. (2012). Recommendation for the Triple Data Encryption Algorithm (TDEA) Block Cipher: NIST Special Publication 800-67, Revision 2. 17 indexed citations
4.
Barker, William C. & Elaine B. Barker. (2012). SP 800-67 Rev. 1. Recommendation for the Triple Data Encryption Algorithm (TDEA) Block Cipher. 11 indexed citations
5.
Dieckmann, William J., et al.. (2009). Strategies for accelerating forward and backprojection in list-mode OSEM PET reconstruction using GPUs. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 4110–4113. 1 indexed citations
6.
Stine, Kevin, et al.. (2008). SP 800-60 Rev. 1. Volume I: Guide for Mapping Types of Information and Information Systems to Security Categories; Volume II: Appendices to Guide for Mapping Types of Information and Information Systems to Security Categories. Nursing Outlook. 12. 42–4. 5 indexed citations
7.
Barker, William C., et al.. (2008). SP 800-87 Rev. 1. Codes for Identification of Federal and Federally-Assisted Organizations. 2 indexed citations
8.
Barker, Elaine B., William C. Barker, William E. Burr, William T. Polk, & Miles E. Smid. (2007). SP 800-57. Recommendation for Key Management, Part 1: General (revised). 76 indexed citations
9.
Byars, L., M. Sibomana, Z. Burbar, et al.. (2006). Variance Reduction on Randoms from Delayed Coincidence Histograms for the HRRT. 5. 2622–2626. 47 indexed citations
10.
Barker, William C., Jeih‐San Liow, Moses Rodriguez, et al.. (2005). Randoms Estimation for List-mode Reconstruction for the ECAT HRRT. IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004.. 6. 3510–3513. 9 indexed citations
11.
Barker, Elaine B., et al.. (2005). SP 800-21 Second edition. Guideline for Implementing Cryptography in the Federal Government. 1 indexed citations
12.
Barker, William C.. (2004). Recommendation for the Triple Data Encryption Algorithm (TDEA) Block Cipher Information Security. 1 indexed citations
13.
Johnson, Calvin A., Moses Rodriguez, Yumo Zhao, et al.. (2004). Software architecture of the MOLAR-HRRT reconstruction engine. IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004.. 3956–3960 Vol. 6. 22 indexed citations
14.
Carson, Richard E., William C. Barker, Jeih‐San Liow, & Calvin A. Johnson. (2004). Design of a motion-compensation OSEM list-mode algorithm for resolution-recovery reconstruction for the HRRT. 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515). 3281–3285. 216 indexed citations
15.
Barker, William C., et al.. (2003). Evaluation issues for an integrated 'INFOSEC' product. 271–275.
16.
Barker, William C.. (2003). Use of privacy-enhanced mail for software distribution. 344–347.
17.
Rotman‐Pikielny, Pnina, James C. Reynolds, William C. Barker, et al.. (2000). Recombinant Human Thyrotropin for the Diagnosis and Treatment of a Highly Functional Metastatic Struma Ovarii*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 85(1). 237–244. 54 indexed citations
18.
Thom, Arleen K., H. Richard Alexander, Mary P. Andrich, et al.. (1995). Cytokine levels and systemic toxicity in patients undergoing isolated limb perfusion with high-dose tumor necrosis factor, interferon gamma, and melphalan.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 13(1). 264–273. 80 indexed citations
19.
Branstad, Martha, William C. Barker, & Pauline A. Cochrane. (1990). The role of trust in protected mail. 210–215. 3 indexed citations
20.
Barker, William C., et al.. (1989). Tea and I: An allergy (computer security). 178–182. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026