William Brucker

945 total citations
8 papers, 624 citations indexed

About

William Brucker is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, William Brucker has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 624 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 2 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in William Brucker's work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (2 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (1 paper) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (1 paper). William Brucker is often cited by papers focused on Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (2 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (1 paper) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (1 paper). William Brucker collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and India. William Brucker's co-authors include João A. Paulo, Edward Hawrot, Michael E. Ford, Vanaja Kumar, Marisa L. Pedulla, Lauren Keenan, Debbie Jacobs-Sera, Jeffrey Lawrence, Graham F. Hatfull and John A. Lewis and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Proteome Research.

In The Last Decade

William Brucker

8 papers receiving 611 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
William Brucker United States	6	433	390	107	97	94	8	624
Tomoko Mihara Japan	6	397 0.9×	267 0.7×	182 1.7×	43 0.4×	32 0.3×	7	570
Michael Schirm Canada	10	250 0.6×	584 1.5×	57 0.5×	64 0.7×	179 1.9×	13	1.0k
Hallie P. Febvre United States	7	191 0.4×	176 0.5×	55 0.5×	31 0.3×	49 0.5×	13	486
Sunghee Chai Germany	15	368 0.8×	512 1.3×	93 0.9×	39 0.4×	314 3.3×	22	720
Steven J. Zullo United States	9	350 0.8×	286 0.7×	51 0.5×	26 0.3×	60 0.6×	16	569
Erin Wall United States	10	265 0.6×	286 0.7×	40 0.4×	24 0.2×	182 1.9×	12	517
Katarzyna Leskinen Finland	13	187 0.4×	205 0.5×	62 0.6×	52 0.5×	106 1.1×	17	510
Evgeny Klimuk Russia	14	324 0.7×	302 0.8×	77 0.7×	33 0.3×	116 1.2×	18	445
Sergey Nazarov Switzerland	12	244 0.6×	256 0.7×	46 0.4×	23 0.2×	122 1.3×	14	550
Paul C. M. Fogg United Kingdom	15	468 1.1×	383 1.0×	58 0.5×	16 0.2×	177 1.9×	26	681

Countries citing papers authored by William Brucker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Brucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Brucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Brucker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Brucker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Brucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Brucker. The network helps show where William Brucker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Brucker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Brucker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Brucker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Brucker. William Brucker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Brucker, William, et al.. (2024). Arthrogryposis, renal dysfunction, cholestasis syndrome with a novel mutation in two siblings. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(5). e8853–e8853. 1 indexed citations

2.

Muss, Candace, Nina Powell‐Hamilton, Monica H. Wojcik, et al.. (2023). A novel syndrome associated with prenatal fentanyl exposure. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(1). 100834–100834. 13 indexed citations

3.

Hecht, Leah, et al.. (2022). The development of end stage renal disease in two patients with PMM2‐CDG. JIMD Reports. 63(2). 131–136. 3 indexed citations

4.

D’Gama, Alissa M., William Brucker, Tian Zhang, et al.. (2020). A phenotypically severe, biochemically “silent” case of HIBCH deficiency in a newborn diagnosed by rapid whole exome sequencing and enzymatic testing. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 182(4). 780–784. 5 indexed citations

5.

Brucker, William, Stacy E. Croteau, John R. Prensner, et al.. (2020). An emerging role for endothelial barrier support therapy for congenital disorders of glycosylation. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. 43(4). 880–890. 14 indexed citations

6.

Demirbas, Didem, William Brucker, & Gerard T. Berry. (2018). Inborn Errors of Metabolism with Hepatopathy. Pediatric Clinics of North America. 65(2). 337–352. 15 indexed citations

7.

Paulo, João A., William Brucker, & Edward Hawrot. (2009). Proteomic Analysis of an α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Interactome. Journal of Proteome Research. 8(4). 1849–1858. 78 indexed citations

8.

Pedulla, Marisa L., Michael E. Ford, Jennifer M. Houtz, et al.. (2003). Origins of Highly Mosaic Mycobacteriophage Genomes. Cell. 113(2). 171–182. 495 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact