William B. Thomas

44 papers receiving 964 citations

Peers

William B. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Small Animals 313
  • Equine 61
  • Neurology 78
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 155
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 147
Replace Beverly K. Sturges with:
Beverly K. Sturges United States
Marc Kent United States
Rodrigo Gutierrez‐Quintana United Kingdom
Thomas Flegel Germany
Rodolfo Cappello United Kingdom
Sònia Añor Spain
Benjamin D. Young United States
Cleta Sue Bailey United States
Sibylle Kneissl Austria
Martin Konar Switzerland
William B. Thomas relative to Beverly K. Sturges United States Beverly K. Sturges's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Beverly K. Sturges · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William B. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William B. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William B. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William B. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William B. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William B. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William B. Thomas. The network helps show where William B. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William B. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William B. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together William B. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200983
2 199677
3 200975
4 199163
5 200062
6 199853
7 199952
8 200048
9 200140
10 201140
11 200938
12 199638
13 200137
14 200035
15 199735
16 199731
17 201421
18 199320
19 200020
20 198218

About William B. Thomas

William B. Thomas is a scholar working on Small Animals, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Education, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (12 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (5 papers), Veterinary Oncology Research (5 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (3 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers) and Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (313 citations), Equine (61 citations), Neurology (78 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (155 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (147 citations). William B. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Donald C. Sorjonen, Silke Hecht, Joe N. Kornegay, William Adams, Stephen T. Simpson, Simon J. Wheeler, Nicholas Sharp, Luisa De Risio, Μ. D. McGavin and Kevin Moran. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice, Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, The Journal of Negro Education and American Journal of Veterinary Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact