Stephen T. Simpson
Impact in
- Equine top 2%
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Small Animals top 1%
- Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Papers in
-
- Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology 7
- Equine 1
- Co-authors
- Donald C. SorjonenJudith A. HudsonWilliam B. ThomasDonald F. BuxtonRobert E. CarteeNancy R. CoxJohn H. ChidlowStephen J. Thoma
- Journals
- Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (7 papers)Veterinary Surgery (4 papers)Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound (4 papers)American Journal of Veterinary Research (3 papers)Veterinary Research Communications (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
Stephen T. Simpson
35 papers receiving 643 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Equine 68
- Small Animals 269
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 175
- Biochemistry 44
- Surgery 233
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen T. Simpson
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen T. Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen T. Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen T. Simpson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen T. Simpson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen T. Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen T. Simpson. The network helps show where Stephen T. Simpson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen T. Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 10 | Regional nerve blocks. Part 4--Office blocks of the foot and ankle. | 2001 | 1 |
| 11 | 1997 | 13 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 27 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 107 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 13 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 9 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 10 | |
| 20 | 1982 | 2 |
About Stephen T. Simpson
Stephen T. Simpson is a scholar working on Small Animals, Equine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Clinical Biochemistry and Surgery, having authored 37 papers that have together received 665 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (7 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (4 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), Veterinary Oncology Research (3 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (3 papers) and Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (68 citations), Small Animals (269 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (175 citations), Biochemistry (44 citations) and Surgery (233 citations). Stephen T. Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Donald C. Sorjonen, Judith A. Hudson, William B. Thomas, Donald F. Buxton, Robert E. Cartee, Nancy R. Cox, John H. Chidlow, Stephen J. Thoma, Xinjun Teng and David J. Lefer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Veterinary Surgery, Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, American Journal of Veterinary Research and Veterinary Research Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.