Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by William B. Johnson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William B. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William B. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William B. Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William B. Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William B. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William B. Johnson. The network helps show where William B. Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William B. Johnson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William B. Johnson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William B. Johnson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William B. Johnson. William B. Johnson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Johnson, William B. & Carla Hackworth. (2008). Human factors in maintenance. 3(3).1 indexed citations
5.
Johnson, William B. & Gideon Schechtman. (2007). Multiplication operators on L(L_p) and $\ell_p$-strictly singular operators. Journal of the European Mathematical Society. 10(4). 1105–1119.2 indexed citations
6.
Johnson, William B., et al.. (2006). l~p (p > 2) does not coarsely embed into a Hilbert space. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 134(4). 1045–1050.13 indexed citations
7.
Johnson, William B. & Joram Lindenstrauss. (2001). Handbook of geometry of Banach spaces. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2.326 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Arias, Alvaro, T. Figiel, William B. Johnson, & Gideon Schechtman. (1995). Banach spaces with the 2-summing property. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 347(10). 3835–3857.3 indexed citations
9.
Browning, Edgar K. & William B. Johnson. (1986). The Cost of Reducing Economic Inequality. Cato Journal. 6(1). 85–109.1 indexed citations
Johnson, William B.. (1977). On quotients of $L_p$ which are quotients of $\ell _p$. Compositio Mathematica. 34(1). 69–89.28 indexed citations
12.
Johnson, William B. & Edward Odell. (1974). Subspaces of $L_p$ which embed into $l_p$. Compositio Mathematica. 28(1). 37–49.37 indexed citations
13.
Figiel, T. & William B. Johnson. (1974). A uniformly convex Banach space which contains no $l_p$. Compositio Mathematica. 29(2). 179–190.93 indexed citations
14.
Davis, William J., T. Figiel, William B. Johnson, & A. Pełczyński. (1974). Factoring weakly compact operators. Journal of Functional Analysis. 17(3). 311–327.278 indexed citations
Davis, William J. & William B. Johnson. (1973). A renorming of nonreflexive Banach spaces. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society. 37(2). 486–486.17 indexed citations
Johnson, William B.. (1970). Markuschevich bases and duality theory. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 149(1). 171–177.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.