W.G. Mook

6.6k total citations · 2 hit papers
63 papers, 4.9k citations indexed

About

W.G. Mook is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Ecology and Geochemistry and Petrology. According to data from OpenAlex, W.G. Mook has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 4.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Atmospheric Science, 19 papers in Ecology and 14 papers in Geochemistry and Petrology. Recurrent topics in W.G. Mook's work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (20 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (14 papers) and Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (13 papers). W.G. Mook is often cited by papers focused on Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (20 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (14 papers) and Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (13 papers). W.G. Mook collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. W.G. Mook's co-authors include J. C. Vogel, Pieter Meiert Grootes, Wim Salomons, F. C. Tan, C. A. M. Brenninkmeijer, Willem Salomons, Pieter P. Tans, Philipp Kraft, Andrew Goudie and D. Eisma and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Analytical Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

W.G. Mook

61 papers receiving 4.5k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Carbon isotope fractionation between dissolved bicarbonate and gaseous carbon dioxide

1974 1.4k citations W.G. Mook et al. profile →
Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology

1971 300 citations W.G. Mook profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
W.G. Mook Netherlands	32	2.1k	1.7k	1.1k	1.1k	1.1k	63	4.9k
H. Roy Krouse Canada	39	1.9k 0.9×	1.0k 0.6×	409 0.4×	1.6k 1.5×	683 0.6×	117	5.0k
Egon T. Degens United States	45	1.9k 0.9×	2.3k 1.4×	2.7k 2.4×	1.1k 1.0×	1.1k 1.1×	121	7.7k
Samuel M. Savin United States	37	3.1k 1.5×	1.2k 0.7×	938 0.8×	1.3k 1.3×	337 0.3×	76	6.0k
Karl Otto Münnich Germany	35	2.0k 0.9×	669 0.4×	905 0.8×	1.1k 1.0×	1.6k 1.5×	72	4.4k
Abraham Lerman United States	27	1.1k 0.5×	699 0.4×	797 0.7×	960 0.9×	390 0.4×	56	3.4k
K. L. Von Damm United States	34	1.8k 0.9×	1.0k 0.6×	1.2k 1.1×	2.0k 1.9×	587 0.6×	61	6.5k
U. Siegenthaler Switzerland	40	4.4k 2.1×	1.7k 1.0×	2.0k 1.8×	550 0.5×	3.3k 3.2×	73	7.7k
S. Krishnaswami India	49	2.5k 1.2×	711 0.4×	933 0.8×	3.4k 3.2×	1.3k 1.2×	110	6.6k
W. S. Broecker United States	36	2.9k 1.4×	1.2k 0.7×	1.3k 1.2×	544 0.5×	736 0.7×	89	4.5k
Boáz Lazar Israel	34	1.5k 0.7×	1.6k 0.9×	1.6k 1.5×	838 0.8×	843 0.8×	119	4.1k

Countries citing papers authored by W.G. Mook

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.G. Mook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.G. Mook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.G. Mook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.G. Mook

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.G. Mook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.G. Mook. The network helps show where W.G. Mook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W.G. Mook

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W.G. Mook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W.G. Mook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W.G. Mook. W.G. Mook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Mook, W.G., et al.. (2016). Archaeological implications of natural carbon-14 variations. 21. 9–18.

2.

Mook, W.G.. (2006). Introduction to Isotope Hydrology. Stable and Radioactive Isotopes of Hydrogen, Oxygen and Carbon.. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 50 indexed citations

3.

Mook, W.G., et al.. (2000). Man's impact on groundwater systems. UNESCO eBooks. 3 indexed citations

4.

Bruins, Hendrik J., J. van der Plicht, & W.G. Mook. (1991). Establishing Calibrated 14C Chronologies: Problematic Time Zones and High-Precision Dating, with Reference to Near Eastern Archaeology. Radiocarbon. 33(2). 183–184. 1 indexed citations

5.

Bruins, Hendrik J., et al.. (1991). Establishing Calibrated 14C Chronologies. Radiocarbon. 183–184.

6.

Eisma, D., P. Bernard, Gerhard C. Cadée, et al.. (1991). Suspended-matter particle size in some west-European estuaries; part I: Particle-size distribution. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research. 28(3). 193–214. 63 indexed citations

7.

Plicht, J. van der & W.G. Mook. (1989). Calibration of Radiocarbon Ages by Computer. Radiocarbon. 31(3). 805–816. 49 indexed citations

8.

Plassche, O. van de, W.G. Mook, & A. L. Bloom. (1989). Submergence of coastal Connecticut 6000–3000 (14C) years B.P.. Marine Geology. 86(4). 349–354. 20 indexed citations

9.

Salomons, Wim, et al.. (1988). Copper in the fly river system (Papua new guinea) as influenced by discharges of mine residue: Overview of the study and preliminary findings. Environmental Technology Letters. 9(9). 931–940. 4 indexed citations

10.

Geer, G Van de, Eric A. Colhoun, & W.G. Mook. (1986). Stratigraphy, pollen analysis and paleoclimatic interpretation of Mowrray and Rroadmeadows Swamps, North Western Tasmania. Australian Geographer. 17(2). 121–133. 18 indexed citations

11.

Mook, W.G., et al.. (1986). Groningen ¹⁴C Data Base. Radiocarbon. 28(2A). 788–796. 5 indexed citations

12.

Mook, W.G., et al.. (1983). The N2O correction in the carbon and oxygen isotopic analysis of atmospheric CO2. Chemical Geology. 41. 237–242. 58 indexed citations

13.

Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Philipp Kraft, & W.G. Mook. (1983). Oxygen isotope fractionation between CO2 and H2O. Chemical Geology. 41. 181–190. 152 indexed citations

14.

Colhoun, Eric A., G Van de Geer, & W.G. Mook. (1982). Stratigraphy, Pollen Analysis, and Paleoclimatic Interpretation of Pulbeena Swamp, Northwestern Tasmania. Quaternary Research. 18(1). 108–126. 69 indexed citations

15.

Mook, W.G., et al.. (1982). An anomalous Suess effect above Europe. Nature. 298(5875). 641–644. 22 indexed citations

16.

Lundqvist, Jan & W.G. Mook. (1981). Finite date of the Jämtland Interstadial. Boreas. 10(2). 133–135. 20 indexed citations

17.

Tans, Pieter P. & W.G. Mook. (1978). Design, Construction and Calibration of A High Accuracy Carbon-14 Counting Set up. Radiocarbon. 21(1). 22–40. 16 indexed citations

18.

Mamakowa, K., et al.. (1975). Late Pleistocene flora at Kąty (Pieniny Mts., West Carpathians). Acta Palaeobotanica. 16(2). 2 indexed citations

19.

Lerman, Jerrold, W.G. Mook, J. C. Vogel, & H. de Waard. (1969). Carbon-14 in Patagonian Tree Rings. Science. 165(3898). 1123–1125. 9 indexed citations

20.

Grootes, Pieter Meiert, W.G. Mook, & J. C. Vogel. (1969). Isotopic fractionation between gaseous and condensed carbon dioxide. Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei. 221(3). 257–273. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact