Werner K. Lutz
- Cancer Research top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 0.5%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Oncology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ch. SchlatterRoman LutzRory B. ConollyUrsula LutzJ. SchlatterS.E. ShephardWolfgang VölkelHelga Stopper
- Topics
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (90 papers)Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (29 papers)DNA Repair Mechanisms (27 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesThe Journal of Experimental MedicinePLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Werner K. Lutz
151 papers receiving 4.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
- Cancer Research 2.0k
- Molecular Biology 1.8k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1.1k
- Plant Science 832
- Oncology 477
Countries citing papers authored by Werner K. Lutz
This map shows the geographic impact of Werner K. Lutz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Werner K. Lutz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Werner K. Lutz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Werner K. Lutz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Werner K. Lutz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Werner K. Lutz. The network helps show where Werner K. Lutz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Werner K. Lutz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Werner K. Lutz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Werner K. Lutz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Werner K. Lutz. Werner K. Lutz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 109 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 107 | |
| 7 | 191 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 74 | |
| 13 | 117 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 112 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Werner K. Lutz
Werner K. Lutz is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Chemical Health and Safety and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 157 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (90 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (29 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (2.0k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.1k citations) and Chemical Health and Safety (48 citations). Werner K. Lutz has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ch. Schlatter, Roman Lutz, Rory B. Conolly, Ursula Lutz, J. Schlatter, S.E. Shephard, Wolfgang Völkel, Helga Stopper, Michael B. Otteneder and Christian Schlatter. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Experimental Medicine and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.