Wendy Ng

9 papers receiving 199 citations

Peers

Wendy Ng
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Management Information Systems 83
  • Information Systems 123
  • Finance 24
  • Strategy and Management 32
  • Human-Computer Interaction 8
Replace Fred Steinmetz with:
Fred Steinmetz Germany
Vitalik Buterin United States
Tomasz Kaczmarek Poland
Harish Natarajan Hungary
Kean Wu United States
Marc Pilkington France
Bernhard Lutz Germany
Florian Idelberger Italy
Mark Giancaspro Australia
Saifedean Ammous Lebanon
Wendy Ng relative to Fred Steinmetz Germany Fred Steinmetz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×38×
Fred Steinmetz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wendy Ng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wendy Ng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wendy Ng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wendy Ng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wendy Ng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wendy Ng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wendy Ng. The network helps show where Wendy Ng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Wendy Ng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wendy Ng Line = papers co-authored together Wendy Ng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2016137
2 201731
3 199620
4 201720
5 20215
6 20175
7 20052
8 20201
9 20211
10
The Chinese MOFCOM releases the interim provisions on the applicable standards in simple cases of concentrations of undertakings for public comment
20130
11 20150
12 20040

About Wendy Ng

Wendy Ng is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Management Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Law, having authored 12 papers that have together received 222 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include World Trade Organization Law (3 papers), FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance (2 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (2 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (1 paper), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (1 paper), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper) and Diverse Legal and Medical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (83 citations), Information Systems (123 citations), Finance (24 citations), Strategy and Management (32 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (8 citations). Wendy Ng has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Brendan Malone, David C. Mills, Kathy Wang, Anton Badev, Dieter Wege, Lauren Wilcox, Jessica Hammer, Emily D. Gottfried and David M. Glassmire. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Tetrahedron Letters, Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry and The Antitrust Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact