Wendy Hatch

981 total citations
30 papers, 545 citations indexed

About

Wendy Hatch is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Wendy Hatch has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 545 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Ophthalmology, 20 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 13 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Wendy Hatch's work include Corneal surgery and disorders (15 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (14 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (13 papers). Wendy Hatch is often cited by papers focused on Corneal surgery and disorders (15 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (14 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (13 papers). Wendy Hatch collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Israel. Wendy Hatch's co-authors include Chaim M. Bell, Geta Cernat, Graham E. Trope, Robert G. Devenyi, Yvonne M. Buys, David T. Wong, David R. Urbach, John G. Flanagan, Donna Williams-Lyn and Ya-Ping Jin and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Ophthalmology and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

In The Last Decade

Wendy Hatch

28 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Wendy Hatch Canada 15 434 291 101 68 35 30 545
Sukhpal S. Sandhu Australia 15 523 1.2× 339 1.2× 77 0.8× 37 0.5× 25 0.7× 40 606
Mei-Ying Lai United States 9 413 1.0× 392 1.3× 95 0.9× 77 1.1× 38 1.1× 10 527
M K M Adams United Kingdom 4 409 0.9× 192 0.7× 115 1.1× 25 0.4× 43 1.2× 5 441
Govinda Paudyal Nepal 17 790 1.8× 602 2.1× 251 2.5× 40 0.6× 27 0.8× 43 918
Raba Thapa Nepal 14 452 1.0× 379 1.3× 91 0.9× 18 0.3× 33 0.9× 55 575
Dušica Pahor Slovenia 12 328 0.8× 182 0.6× 35 0.3× 54 0.8× 32 0.9× 71 413
Pia Veronika Vécsei‐Marlovits Austria 14 452 1.0× 336 1.2× 99 1.0× 53 0.8× 18 0.5× 50 539
Matteo Mario Carlà Italy 10 203 0.5× 220 0.8× 40 0.4× 22 0.3× 14 0.4× 79 350
Harry Roberts United Kingdom 13 340 0.8× 280 1.0× 63 0.6× 73 1.1× 25 0.7× 48 434
Michael A. Mahr United States 12 284 0.7× 142 0.5× 70 0.7× 40 0.6× 163 4.7× 33 458

Countries citing papers authored by Wendy Hatch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wendy Hatch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wendy Hatch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wendy Hatch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wendy Hatch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wendy Hatch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wendy Hatch. The network helps show where Wendy Hatch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wendy Hatch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wendy Hatch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wendy Hatch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wendy Hatch. Wendy Hatch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Ma, Julia, Simona C. Minotti, Jenny Qian, et al.. (2023). Multi-center validation of Catquest-9SF visual function questionnaire in Ontario, Canada. PLoS ONE. 18(7). e0278863–e0278863. 1 indexed citations
3.
Tone, Stephan Ong, et al.. (2023). Subjective and objective evaluation of corneal haze after accelerated corneal crosslinking for corneal ectasias. Acta Ophthalmologica. 101(5). 568–574. 3 indexed citations
4.
Cohen‬‏, Eyal, Stephan Ong Tone, Michael Mimouni, et al.. (2023). Comparison of long-term outcomes of simultaneous accelerated corneal crosslinking combined with intracorneal ring segment or topography-guided PRK. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 50(4). 378–384. 1 indexed citations
5.
Hatch, Wendy, Iqbal Ike K. Ahmed, Matthew B. Schlenker, et al.. (2022). Ontario Cataract Quality Outcome Initiative: appropriateness and prioritization of cataract surgery. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 58(4). 382–390.
6.
Felfeli, Tina, et al.. (2020). Spread of Respiratory Droplets in a Simulated Ophthalmic Surgery. Ophthalmology. 128(6). 945–947. 7 indexed citations
7.
Tone, Stephan Ong, Raymond Stein, Clara C. Chan, et al.. (2020). Comparison of accelerated CXL alone, accelerated CXL-ICRS, and accelerated CXL-TG-PRK in progressive keratoconus and other corneal ectasias. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 46(2). 276–286. 32 indexed citations
8.
Sorkin, Nir, et al.. (2020). Factors affecting central corneal thickness measurement agreement between Scheimpflug imaging and ultrasound pachymetry in keratoconus. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 105(10). 1371–1375. 2 indexed citations
9.
Hatch, Wendy, Sherif El-Defrawy, Stephan Ong Tone, et al.. (2020). Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking: Efficacy, Risk of Progression, and Characteristics Affecting Outcomes. A Large, Single-Center Prospective Study. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 213. 76–87. 18 indexed citations
10.
Ma, Jingyi, et al.. (2019). Vision to improve: quality improvement in ophthalmology. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 55(2). 107–115. 6 indexed citations
11.
Hatch, Wendy, Varun Chaudhary, Sherif El-Defrawy, et al.. (2019). Validation and application of Catquest-9SF in various populations: A systematic review. Survey of Ophthalmology. 65(3). 348–360. 21 indexed citations
12.
Cheng, Richard, Efrem D. Mandelcorn, Edward Margolin, et al.. (2019). Validation of Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Segmentation in Neurodegenerative Disease. Translational Vision Science & Technology. 8(5). 6–6. 14 indexed citations
13.
Pechlivanoglou, Petros, et al.. (2017). Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in the Management of Keratoconus in Canada. Ophthalmology. 124(8). 1108–1119. 22 indexed citations
14.
Jin, Ya-Ping, et al.. (2014). The Relationship Between Sociodemographic Factors and Persistence With Topical Glaucoma Medications. Journal of Glaucoma. 24(1). 69–76. 20 indexed citations
15.
Jin, Ya-Ping, Yvonne M. Buys, Wendy Hatch, & Graham E. Trope. (2012). De-insurance in Ontario has reduced use of eye care services by the socially disadvantaged. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 47(3). 203–210. 19 indexed citations
16.
Hatch, Wendy, David T. Wong, Robert G. Devenyi, & Chaim M. Bell. (2010). Author reply. Ophthalmology. 117(4). 853–854. 1 indexed citations
17.
Hatch, Wendy, Geta Cernat, David T. Wong, Robert G. Devenyi, & Chaim M. Bell. (2008). Risk Factors for Acute Endophthalmitis after Cataract Surgery: A Population-based Study. Ophthalmology. 116(3). 425–430. 112 indexed citations
18.
Hatch, Wendy, et al.. (2007). A 10-year population-based cohort analysis of cataract surgery rates in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 42(4). 552–556. 19 indexed citations
19.
Hatch, Wendy & Graham E. Trope. (2004). Waiting times for eye surgery at a Toronto teaching hospital. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 39(1). 31–37. 8 indexed citations
20.
Hatch, Wendy, et al.. (1997). Laser scanning tomography of the optic nerve head in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 81(10). 871–876. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026