Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Chandra Deep Field South: The 1 Ms Catalog
2002342 citationsJunxian Wang, Wei Zheng et al.profile →
First Results from the X‐Ray and Optical Survey of theChandraDeep Field South
2001297 citationsWei Zheng et al.The Astrophysical Journalprofile →
The Chandra Deep Field–South: The 1 Million Second Exposure
2002223 citationsWei Zheng et al.The Astrophysical Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Wei Zheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wei Zheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wei Zheng more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wei Zheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wei Zheng. The network helps show where Wei Zheng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wei Zheng
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wei Zheng.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wei Zheng based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Wei Zheng. Wei Zheng is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lípari, S., R. Terlevich, Rubén Díaz, et al.. (2014). Extreme galactic wind and Wolf-Rayet features in infrared mergers and infrared quasi-stellar objects. Americanae (AECID Library).12 indexed citations
Shu, Xinwen, et al.. (2009). NGC 2992 IN AN X-RAY HIGH STATE OBSERVED BY XMM-NEWTON : RESPONSE OF THE RELATIVISTIC Fe Kα LINE TO THE CONTINUUM. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).20 indexed citations
9.
Xin, L. P., et al.. (2009). GRB 090426: TNT confimation of optical counterpart.. GRB Coordinates Network. 9255. 1.2 indexed citations
Liu, Jiren, et al.. (2006). A Unified Fitting of H I and He II Lyα Transmitted Flux of QSO HE2347 with ΛCDM Hydrodynamic Simulations.10 indexed citations
14.
Zheng, Wei, H. C. Ford, J. W. Kruk, et al.. (2003). PRIME: probing the very early universe. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 4850. 1132–1132.1 indexed citations
15.
Zheng, Wei. (2000). Synthesis and Characterization of RE-Chlorophyll-a Complexes (RE=La, Ce, Eu and Y).
16.
Zheng, Wei & Tao Liu. (2000). Determination of Double Decker Sandwich Structure of Praseodymium-chlorophyll a Molecule. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities.5 indexed citations
17.
Zheng, Wei, et al.. (2000). Determination of Double Decker Sandwich Structured La - Substituted Chlorophyll a by EXAFS.1 indexed citations
Zheng, Wei & P. T. O’Brien. (1989). Optical Fe II Emission: A Probe for an Accretion Disk?. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 21. 776.1 indexed citations
20.
Zheng, Wei. (1988). The critical densities for some emission lines. 27(4). 275–279.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.