Wayne D. Parker

3.1k total citations
27 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Wayne D. Parker is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Wayne D. Parker has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Clinical Psychology, 19 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Wayne D. Parker's work include Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (14 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (12 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers). Wayne D. Parker is often cited by papers focused on Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (14 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (12 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers). Wayne D. Parker collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Czechia. Wayne D. Parker's co-authors include Heinrich Stumpf, Carol J. Mills, Paul T. Costa, Jean-Pierre Rolland, Robert R. McCrae, Karen E. Ablard, Ivan Mervielde, Antonio Terracciano, Filip De Fruyt and Robert R. McCrae and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Personality and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

Wayne D. Parker

26 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Wayne D. Parker United States	20	1.7k	1.1k	639	521	201	27	2.2k
Clarry H. Lay Canada	25	1.7k 1.0×	899 0.8×	656 1.0×	698 1.3×	272 1.4×	35	2.4k
Anssi Peräkylä Finland	33	1.1k 0.6×	883 0.8×	662 1.0×	370 0.7×	125 0.6×	99	3.6k
Patrick M. Markey United States	32	1.3k 0.8×	523 0.5×	841 1.3×	833 1.6×	187 0.9×	89	2.5k
William McCown United States	17	1.1k 0.6×	503 0.4×	289 0.5×	258 0.5×	165 0.8×	34	1.5k
Mindy J. Erchull United States	28	1.1k 0.6×	295 0.3×	493 0.8×	670 1.3×	183 0.9×	47	2.3k
Walter C. Buboltz United States	25	584 0.3×	944 0.8×	625 1.0×	382 0.7×	135 0.7×	60	2.2k
Estrella Romero Spain	27	1.4k 0.8×	286 0.2×	686 1.1×	646 1.2×	102 0.5×	126	2.2k
Radosław Rogoza Poland	26	1.5k 0.9×	428 0.4×	701 1.1×	372 0.7×	140 0.7×	118	1.9k
Junko Tanaka‐Matsumi Japan	16	952 0.6×	542 0.5×	1.0k 1.6×	328 0.6×	65 0.3×	42	1.9k
Ashley Batts Allen United States	13	1.8k 1.0×	549 0.5×	946 1.5×	313 0.6×	48 0.2×	28	2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Wayne D. Parker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wayne D. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wayne D. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wayne D. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wayne D. Parker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wayne D. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wayne D. Parker. The network helps show where Wayne D. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wayne D. Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wayne D. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wayne D. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wayne D. Parker. Wayne D. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Parker, Wayne D., et al.. (2022). To Click, or Not to Click? Perfectionism and the Association of Gender and Competitiveness on Game-Point Monitoring. Technology Knowledge and Learning. 28(4). 1841–1870.

2.

Parker, Wayne D., et al.. (2012). Social Mood, Stock Market Performance, and U.S. Presidential Elections. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(4). 13 indexed citations

3.

Parker, Wayne D., et al.. (2007). The Financial/Economic Dichotomy in Social Behavioral Dynamics: The Socionomic Perspective. Journal of Behavioral Finance. 8(2). 84–108. 10 indexed citations

4.

Parker, Wayne D., et al.. (2005). Herding: An Interdisciplinary Integrative Review from a Socionomic Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal. 22 indexed citations

5.

McCrae, Robert R., Paul T. Costa, Antonio Terracciano, et al.. (2002). Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional and cross-cultural analyses.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 83(6). 1456–1468. 28 indexed citations

6.

McCrae, Robert R., Paul T. Costa, Antonio Terracciano, et al.. (2002). Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional and cross-cultural analyses.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 83(6). 1456–1468. 328 indexed citations

7.

Parker, Wayne D., et al.. (2001). Perfectionism in Mathematically Gifted and Typical Czech Students. journal for the education of the gifted. 25(2). 138–152. 36 indexed citations

8.

Parker, Wayne D.. (2000). Healthy Perfectionism in the Gifted. 11(4). 173–182. 65 indexed citations

9.

Stumpf, Heinrich & Wayne D. Parker. (2000). A hierarchical structural analysis of perfectionism and its relation to other personality characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences. 28(5). 837–852. 239 indexed citations

10.

Parker, Wayne D., et al.. (2000). The Authors' Dialogue. 11(4). 209–214. 5 indexed citations

11.

Parker, Wayne D., et al.. (2000). The Five-Factor Model of Personality in South African College Students. American Behavioral Scientist. 44(1). 112–125. 41 indexed citations

12.

McCrae, Robert R., et al.. (1998). Cross-Cultural Assessment of the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 29(1). 171–188. 277 indexed citations

13.

Parker, Wayne D.. (1998). Birth-Order Effects in the Academically Talented. Gifted Child Quarterly. 42(1). 29–38. 27 indexed citations

14.

Parker, Wayne D. & Heinrich Stumpf. (1998). A validation of the five-factor model of personality in academically talented youth across observers and instruments. Personality and Individual Differences. 25(6). 1005–1025. 83 indexed citations

15.

Parker, Wayne D., et al.. (1998). A Psychometric Examination of the French Translations of NEO-PI-R and NEO-FFI. Journal of Personality Assessment. 71(2). 269–291. 145 indexed citations

16.

Mills, Carol J. & Wayne D. Parker. (1998). Cognitive-psychological profiles of gifted adolescents from Ireland and the U.S.: Cross-societal comparisons. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 22(1). 1–16. 13 indexed citations

17.

Parker, Wayne D., et al.. (1996). Perfectionism and Suicidal Preoccupation. Journal of Personality. 64(2). 529–543. 95 indexed citations

18.

Parker, Wayne D.. (1996). Psychological Adjustment in Mathematically Gifted Students. Gifted Child Quarterly. 40(3). 154–157. 29 indexed citations

19.

Parker, Wayne D., et al.. (1995). The Incidence of Perfectionism in Honors and Regular College Students. 7(1). 303–309. 20 indexed citations

20.

Parker, Wayne D., et al.. (1995). Perfectionism and the gifted. Roeper Review. 17(3). 173–175. 79 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact