Warwick Tucker

51 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Warwick Tucker
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 603
  • Mathematical Physics 321
  • Geometry and Topology 181
  • Numerical Analysis 82
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 96
Replace Oliver Junge with:
Oliver Junge Germany
Jiu Ding United States
Fritz Colonius Germany
Mark A. Pinsky United States
Harold R. Parks United States
Wolfgang Kliemann United States
Michiel Hazewinkel Netherlands
Peter H. Baxendale United States
Michele Pavon Italy
Michael Scheutzow Germany
Warwick Tucker relative to Oliver Junge Germany Oliver Junge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Oliver Junge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Warwick Tucker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Warwick Tucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Warwick Tucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Warwick Tucker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Warwick Tucker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Warwick Tucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Warwick Tucker. The network helps show where Warwick Tucker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Warwick Tucker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Warwick Tucker Line = papers co-authored together Warwick Tucker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999328
2 2002268
3 200697
4 200247
5 200743
6 200637
7 200328
8 200826
9 201521
10 200621
11 201119
12 200919
13 199919
14 200818
15 201118
16 201316
17 201516
18 200815
19 200813
20 201112

About Warwick Tucker

Warwick Tucker is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (17 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (11 papers), Numerical Methods and Algorithms (11 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (11 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (10 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (7 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (6 papers) and Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (603 citations), Mathematical Physics (321 citations), Geometry and Topology (181 citations), Numerical Analysis (82 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (96 citations). Warwick Tucker has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Scott Ferson, Vincent Moulton, Zbigniew Galias, Zoltán Kutalik, Stefano Luzzatto, Daniel Wilczak, Barbara Burke Hubbard, John H. Hubbard, Roberto Barrio and Jordi Villadelprat. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Journal of Differential Equations, Applied Mathematics and Computation and Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact