Warren L. Nance
- Plant Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Cell Biology
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Co-authors
- C. Dana NelsonR. L. DoudrickThomas L. KubisiakMichael StineG. S. FosterJ. S. Heslop‐HarrisonThomas SchmidtTrude Schwarzacher
- Topics
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (6 papers)Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (5 papers)Forest ecology and management (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Warren L. Nance
18 papers receiving 403 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Plant Science 260
- Molecular Biology 208
- Genetics 167
- Cell Biology 106
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 77
Countries citing papers authored by Warren L. Nance
This map shows the geographic impact of Warren L. Nance's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Warren L. Nance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Warren L. Nance more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Warren L. Nance
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Warren L. Nance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Warren L. Nance. The network helps show where Warren L. Nance may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Warren L. Nance
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Warren L. Nance. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Warren L. Nance based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Warren L. Nance. Warren L. Nance is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 66 | |
| 5 | 73 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 1994 Second International Symposium on the APPLICATIONS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY TO TREE CULTURE, PROTECTION, AND UTILIZATION | 0 |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 64 | |
| 11 | 91 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Effects of pollen source on loblolly pine resistance to Cronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiforme. | 4 |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | Phenotypic Variation in Specific Gravity and Fiber Length of Cherrybark Oak | 1 |
| 20 | Crossing eastern cottonwood in the greenhouse | 3 |
About Warren L. Nance
Warren L. Nance is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Agronomy and Crop Science and Plant Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (6 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (5 papers) and Forest ecology and management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (260 citations), Cell Biology (106 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (77 citations). Warren L. Nance has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include C. Dana Nelson, R. L. Doudrick, Thomas L. Kubisiak, Michael Stine, G. S. Foster, J. S. Heslop‐Harrison, Thomas Schmidt, Trude Schwarzacher, Richard C. Hamelin and David B. Wagner. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Theoretical and Applied Genetics and Mycologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.