Wanzer Drane

722 citations
15 papers · 546 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Wanzer Drane

15 papers receiving 490 citations

Peers

Wanzer Drane
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Applied Psychology 62
  • Social Psychology 179
  • Clinical Psychology 133
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 72
  • Safety Research 40
Replace Magdalena Szumilas with:
Magdalena Szumilas Canada
Yi‐Chen Chiang China
Lindsay Smith Australia
Lindsey Webb United States
Daniel Fernández Spain
Elizabeth Lambert United States
Giacomo Bignardi United Kingdom
Debjani Das Australia
Julia Reynolds Australia
Matthew Hamilton Australia
Wanzer Drane relative to Magdalena Szumilas Canada Magdalena Szumilas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Magdalena Szumilas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wanzer Drane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wanzer Drane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wanzer Drane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wanzer Drane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wanzer Drane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wanzer Drane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wanzer Drane. The network helps show where Wanzer Drane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wanzer Drane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wanzer Drane Line = papers co-authored together Wanzer Drane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2000247
2 200850
3 200545
4 197244
5 201231
6 200330
7 197122
8 201415
9 200113
10 199813
11 197210
12 197610
13 19969
14 19964
15 19723

About Wanzer Drane

Wanzer Drane is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Computer Networks and Communications, Clinical Psychology, Control and Systems Engineering and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (2 papers), Control Systems and Identification (2 papers), Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (2 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Youth Development and Social Support (1 paper), Parasites and Host Interactions (1 paper) and Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (62 citations), Social Psychology (179 citations), Clinical Psychology (133 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (72 citations) and Safety Research (40 citations). Wanzer Drane has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Robert F. Valois, E. Scott Huebner, Jing Liu, Tiejian Wu, Xuefeng Liu, Roger G. Sargent, Suzanne McDermott, Robert Moran, Tan Platt and Mary Esther Gaulden. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Technometrics, The Journal of Cell Biology, Environmental Research and Experimental Parasitology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact