Wan‐Ching Wu

519 citations
15 papers · 376 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Wan‐Ching Wu

15 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers

Wan‐Ching Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Computer Science Applications 79
  • Information Systems and Management 93
  • Information Systems 279
  • Library and Information Sciences 8
  • Communication 30
Replace Jiqun Liu with:
Jiqun Liu United States
Brynn M. Evans United States
Ke Zhou United Kingdom
Howard Greisdorf United States
Zhen Yue United States
Sanna Kumpulainen Finland
Anne R. Diekema United States
Yusuke Hayashi Japan
Judy Jeng United States
Addison Y.S. Su Taiwan
Wan‐Ching Wu relative to Jiqun Liu United States Jiqun Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×35×
Jiqun Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wan‐Ching Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wan‐Ching Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wan‐Ching Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wan‐Ching Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wan‐Ching Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wan‐Ching Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wan‐Ching Wu. The network helps show where Wan‐Ching Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Wan‐Ching Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wan‐Ching Wu Line = papers co-authored together Wan‐Ching Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2015108
2 201260
3 201354
4 201248
5 201439
6 201421
7 202310
8 201310
9 20129
10 20139
11
A study of generating teaching portfolio from LMS logs
20103
12 20132
13 20191
14 20141
15 20121

About Wan‐Ching Wu

Wan‐Ching Wu is a scholar working on Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Science Applications and General Health Professions, having authored 15 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (11 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (4 papers), Expert finding and Q&A systems (3 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (3 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (1 paper) and Educational Research and Pedagogy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (79 citations), Information Systems and Management (93 citations), Information Systems (279 citations), Library and Information Sciences (8 citations) and Communication (30 citations). Wan‐Ching Wu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Diane Kelly, Jaime Arguello, Avneesh Sud, Falk Scholer, William Webber, R. Capra, Muh‐Chyun Tang, Kun Huang, Ying‐Hsang Liu and Carol Strong. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vaccines, International Journal of Medical Informatics, Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) and RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact