Walther Riese
Impact in
- General Psychology top 10%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
-
- Neurology and Historical Studies
Papers in
-
- Neurology and Historical Studies 8
- History of Medical Practice 3
Walther Riese
32 papers receiving 176 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- General Psychology 20
- Neurology 60
- Philosophy 46
- History and Philosophy of Science 14
- History 32
Countries citing papers authored by Walther Riese
This map shows the geographic impact of Walther Riese's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Walther Riese with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Walther Riese more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Walther Riese
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Walther Riese. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Walther Riese. The network helps show where Walther Riese may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Walther Riese, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The early history of aphasia. | 2010 | 1 |
| 2 | An outline of a history of ideas in neurology. | 2007 | 0 |
| 3 | Auto-observation of aphasia; reported by an eminent nineteenth century medical scientist. | 2003 | 2 |
| 4 | Changing criteria of old age. | 1971 | 1 |
| 5 | The legacy of Philippe Pinel : an inquiry into thought on mental alienation | 1969 | 5 |
| 6 | Brains of Prominent People: History, Facts and Significance | 1966 | 2 |
| 7 | La théorie des passions à la lumière de la pensée médicale du XVIIe siècle | 1965 | 3 |
| 8 | 1965 | 6 | |
| 9 | On the passions and errors of the soul | 1963 | 25 |
| 10 | 1959 | 68 | |
| 11 | 1959 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1959 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1958 | 9 | |
| 14 | Philosophical presuppositions of present-day medicine. | 1956 | 1 |
| 15 | 1956 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1955 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1954 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1952 | 6 | |
| 19 | Adolf Meyer (1866-1950). | 1951 | 0 |
| 20 | 1951 | 4 |
About Walther Riese
Walther Riese is a scholar working on Neurology, General Psychology, History, Philosophy and Classics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 242 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurology and Historical Studies (8 papers), History of Medicine Studies (4 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), History of Medical Practice (3 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (2 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (20 citations), Neurology (60 citations), Philosophy (46 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (14 citations) and History (32 citations). Walther Riese has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Galen, Paul Harkins, Austin H. Riesen, Ebbe Curtis Hoff, Gerhardt von Bonin and William Gooddy. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Journal of Mammalogy, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery and Brain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.