W. Zac Stephens
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Immunology top 2%
- Ecology top 2%
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- Aquatic Science top 1%
- Co-authors
- Karen GuilleminJohn F. RawlsAdam R. BurnsBrendan J. M. BohannanSandi WongKeaton StagamanErika MittgeColleen M. Cavanaugh
- Topics
- Gut microbiota and health (22 papers)Immune Cell Function and Interaction (6 papers)Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
W. Zac Stephens
36 papers receiving 4.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
- Molecular Biology 2.4k
- Immunology 1.3k
- Ecology 909
- Infectious Diseases 502
- Aquatic Science 379
Countries citing papers authored by W. Zac Stephens
This map shows the geographic impact of W. Zac Stephens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Zac Stephens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Zac Stephens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. Zac Stephens
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Zac Stephens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Zac Stephens. The network helps show where W. Zac Stephens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Zac Stephens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Zac Stephens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Zac Stephens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Zac Stephens. W. Zac Stephens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 297 | |
| 9 | 35 | |
| 10 | 50 | |
| 11 | Expansion of Bacteriophages Is Linked to Aggravated Intestinal Inflammation and Colitisbreakdown → | 407 |
| 12 | 171 | |
| 13 | 44 | |
| 14 | 255 | |
| 15 | 126 | |
| 16 | 85 | |
| 17 | 70 | |
| 18 | Evidence for a core gut microbiota in the zebrafishbreakdown → | 890 |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 66 |
About W. Zac Stephens
W. Zac Stephens is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Immunology and Endocrinology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gut microbiota and health (22 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (6 papers) and Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (1.3k citations), Aquatic Science (379 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (126 citations). W. Zac Stephens has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Karen Guillemin, John F. Rawls, Adam R. Burns, Brendan J. M. Bohannan, Sandi Wong, Keaton Stagaman, Erika Mittge, Colleen M. Cavanaugh, Guus Roeselers and David M. Parichy. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.