W. van Rossum

2.1k total citations
13 papers, 48 citations indexed

About

W. van Rossum is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, W. van Rossum has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 48 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Law. Recurrent topics in W. van Rossum's work include Comparative and International Law Studies (3 papers), International Law and Human Rights (2 papers) and Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (2 papers). W. van Rossum is often cited by papers focused on Comparative and International Law Studies (3 papers), International Law and Human Rights (2 papers) and Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (2 papers). W. van Rossum collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. W. van Rossum's co-authors include Kees van den Bos, Peter Mascini, André A. de Waal, Mariëtte van den Hoven, B. de Hart, Patrick Schmidt and Erik Larson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Telos and Utrecht Law Review.

In The Last Decade

W. van Rossum

10 papers receiving 44 citations

Peers

W. van Rossum

LAW

PSIR

SPS

SM

MSOR

Andreas Voßkuhle Germany

Dominik Brodowski Germany

Gert Brüggemeier Germany

Dieter Simon Germany

Daniel Visser Germany

Hermann-Josef Blanke Germany

Markus Müller-Chen

Gerhard Dannemann Germany

Andrew Phang Singapore

Kimmo Nuotio Finland

Andreas Voßkuhle Germany

W. van Rossum

24 ×1.0

LAW

33 ×1.7

PSIR

18 ×1.3

SPS

11 ×1.4

SM

0 ×0.0

MSOR

Citations per year, relative to W. van Rossum W. van Rossum (= 1×) peers Andreas Voßkuhle

Countries citing papers authored by W. van Rossum

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. van Rossum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. van Rossum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. van Rossum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. van Rossum

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. van Rossum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. van Rossum. The network helps show where W. van Rossum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. van Rossum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. van Rossum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. van Rossum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. van Rossum. W. van Rossum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Mascini, Peter & W. van Rossum. (2018). Empirical Legal Research: Fad, Feud or Fellowship?. Erasmus Law Review. 11(2). 89–92. 3 indexed citations

2.

Bos, Kees van den, et al.. (2017). Editorial<br>Methodology of Legal Research: Challenges and Opportunities. Utrecht Law Review. 13(3). 1–1. 33 indexed citations

3.

Rossum, W. van & Mariëtte van den Hoven. (2016). Paucity and the Need for Value Sensitivity in Dealing with Youth Care: Why legal and youth professionals should take cultural and religious considerations seriously. Utrecht Law Review. 12(2). 7–7. 1 indexed citations

4.

Rossum, W. van, et al.. (2016). De paradox van rechter en ritueel. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University).

5.

Larson, Erik, W. van Rossum, & Patrick Schmidt. (2014). The Dutch Confession: Compliance, Leadership and National Identity in the Human Rights Order. Utrecht Law Review. 10(1). 96–96. 1 indexed citations

6.

Hart, B. de, et al.. (2013). Law in the Everyday Lives of Transnational Families. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 3(6). 1 indexed citations

7.

Rossum, W. van, et al.. (2013). Introduction to Law as Plural Phenomenon: Confrontations of Legal Pluralisms. Erasmus Law Review. 6(3-4). 155–157. 1 indexed citations

8.

Rossum, W. van. (2012). Introduction to Framing Multicultural Issues in Terms of Human Rights: Solution or Problem?. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights. 30(4). 382–387.

9.

Rossum, W. van, et al.. (2010). Introduction<br> Human rights law as a site of struggle over multicultural conflicts<br> Comparative and multidisciplinary perspectives. Utrecht Law Review. 6(2). 1–1. 1 indexed citations

10.

Rossum, W. van. (2010). The clash of legal cultures over the ‘best interests of the child’ principle in cases of international parental child abduction. Utrecht Law Review. 6(2). 33–33. 3 indexed citations

11.

Rossum, W. van, et al.. (2008). Waardering en naar de markt brengen van nieuwe technologie. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 82(6). 269–279. 2 indexed citations

12.

Rossum, W. van & André A. de Waal. (2000). Waardering en naar de markt brengen van nieuwe technologie. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 74(6). 269–379. 1 indexed citations

13.

Rossum, W. van. (1986). The Triumph of the Void: On the Conversion of French Intellectuals. Telos. 1986(67). 177–186. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact